Councils clash on restructure costs
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.COUNTY and district councils yesterday wrangled over the cost of changing their structures as the Local Government Commission's work on redrawing English local government got into its stride.
The Association of County Councils published a study claiming that abolition of the counties in favour of all-purpose districts would cost taxpayers pounds 780m a year - the equivalent of adding pounds 36 a head to the poll tax for every charge payer.
Doing the reverse - abolishing districts and letting counties run all services - would produce savings of pounds 720m over current expenditure, the study claimed - pounds 33 less on the poll tax or the full extra cost of implementing care in the community next year.
The study comes as the Local Government Commission has just started serious work on a review of local government structure from which ministers are keen to see more single-tier authorities emerge - believing it easier for electors to hold them accountable for spending. The first changes are due in 1994 with the work to be completed by 1998.
The ACC's study was commissioned from Coopers and Lybrand, which says it used the methodology for assessing indirect costs that the Government has given to the Local Government Commission as guidance.
Over 15 years, the difference between the two options would amount to more than pounds 15bn, the study estimates, with fewer senior managers needed and savings on computing and other costs.
The districts, which claim they can run all services without the need for the counties, rubbished the study. Lady Anson, the chair of the Association of District Councils, said the potential for savings from single-tier districts had been demonstrated in many cases.
The Department of the Environment also expressed scepticism. 'Estimates of the cost of savings from any particular structural change will depend on the precise proposals for each area,' it said.
The dispute came as John Redwood, Local Government Minister, published the first detailed guide from Government of the responsibilities of each council tier and the policy objectives councils are expected to pursue.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments