Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Coronavirus: Ministers try to head off damaging parliamentary defeat with offer of extra scrutiny

Tory MP suggests Boris Johnson has been “abducted by Dr Strangelove”

Kate Devlin
Whitehall Editor
Monday 28 September 2020 22:47 BST
Comments
Matt Hancock announces new restrictions for northeast England

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Ministers have sought to head off a potentially damaging parliamentary defeat on coronavirus by dangling an offer of further scrutiny of the government’s actions in front of Conservative rebels.

The health secretary, Matt Hancock, also announced he planned to meet the leader of the rebels, Sir Graham Brady – the chair of the powerful 1922 group of Tory MPs – on his own party’s benches.

But there was frustration among Tory MPs as bans on loud music, singing and dancing, imposed as part of new emergency coronavirus rules, came into force just hours before Mr Hancock took to his feet in the Commons.

The wide-ranging laws were revealed in legal documents and led to protests from Tory MPs that they had not been debated in parliament.

Mr Hancock told the Commons: "I strongly agree with the need for us in this House to have the appropriate level of scrutiny.

“We’ve already, as the prime minister set out last week, put in place further measures.

“The aim is to provide the House with the opportunity to scrutinise in advance through regular statements and debates, questioning the government’s scientific advisers more regularly, which has already started, gaining access to local data and having the daily calls with ministers including the Paymaster General (Penny Mordaunt).”

He added: “We're looking at further ways to ensure the House can be properly involved in the process in advance where possible.

“And I hope to provide the House with further details soon and I will take up the invitation to a further meeting with (Sir Graham), with whom I have already met to discuss this matter to see what further progress can be made and I hope that that, for the time being, satisfies my right honourable friend.”

In an angry speech the Tory MP for New Forest West, Sir Desmond Swayne, said recent measures taken by the government had left him wondering if the prime minister had been “abducted by Dr Strangelove”.

He added that a presentation by the chief medical officer and the chief scientist last week, warning of the spread of the disease, was “Project Fear” and should have been a “sacking offence”.  

In the Lords, Tory former chancellor Lord Lamont warned repeated lockdowns were untenable because the economy would not survive.

Restrictions introduced by ministers for good reasons were "destroying jobs and businesses", he said.

In the same debate, Tory former health secretary Lord Lansley, said the Government's rule of six law, designed to cut the spread of Covid-19, was "not rational".

He said: "It is rather absurd when you have ministers debating whether it should be a rule of six or rule of eight - I wonder why they didn't decide on a rule of seven."

Tory MP Steve Baker later reported that rebel MPs had met with Mr Hancock and others and that the meeting had been “cordial and constructive”.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in