Coronavirus: Government is confusing people with ‘stay at home’ message while others allowed to return to workplaces, adviser warns
Health psychologist on advisory Sage committee warns of ‘real problem’ with ‘mixed messages’ – as more businesses reopen
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.A government adviser has accused ministers of confusing people by urging them to “stay at home” while also quietly allowing more staff back to their workplaces.
Aides to Priti Patel, the home secretary, have issued a stinging warning that police could be given beefed-up powers to enforce lockdown measures, claiming a “small minority” are flouting the travel ban.
But Susan Michie, a health psychologist who sits on the advisory Sage committee, said ministers were creating “a real problem” with their “mixed messages”.
In recent days, the government has sanctioned a growing numbers of businesses, including DIY stores, construction firms and takeaway food chains, to reopen – requiring their workers to travel, she said.
“What we have seen this last week is that many employers are opening up business again,” said the professor at University College London.
“We must realise that some people are responding to what they are being asked to do, they are not flouting the rules.
“It is very, very difficult when we are getting mixed messages from the government – on the one hand stay at home, on the other hand go into non-essential work.”
Ms Michie said people had “a powerful influence” on each other, telling Sky News: “It may be that people then think, ‘well they are out and about, I think I will go out and about too’. We have a real problem there.”
The comments are significant because the professor is a member of the Covid-19 behavioural science advisory group as well as Sage, the scientific advisory group for emergencies.
They come as a debate rages in the government and the Conservative Party about when and how to relax restrictions, ahead of Boris Johnson’s expected to return to work on Monday.
Traffic levels on the roads have begun creeping up this week and there have been scenes of sizeable crowds in shopping centres and parks in recent days.
Motor vehicle use was recorded at 38 per cent of pre-lockdown levels during the first three days of last week – but rose to 41 per cent from Monday to Wednesday this week.
But the criticism was rejected by Ms Patel, at the daily Downing Street press conference, who said: “The government message has been clear and consistent from day one about staying at home.
“We have also been clear that, if you can’t work from home, you can go to work. There are no mixed messages. We have been clear, the police have been clear.”
The clash came as the home secretary played down hopes of an early easing of the lockdown as the death toll in hospitals passed 20,000.
She called it a “deeply tragic and moving moment”, warning “we are not out of the woods yet” – and telling people to stick to social distancing instructions.
“The government has been abundantly clear about the five specific things that have to be satisfied – this is not optional – so that we can consider with the scientific advisers when it will be safe to adjust the current measures.
“Quite frankly that is not right now. It is clear that it is not right now.”
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments