Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Coronavirus: Disabled people will be seen as ‘expendable’ under emergency powers, Tanni Grey-Thompson fears

‘Decisions will be taken by someone else about our usefulness that we will have no control over’ Paralympian warns

Rob Merrick
Deputy Political Editor
Wednesday 25 March 2020 15:05 GMT
Comments
Tanni Grey-Thompson warns disabled people 'expendable' after coronavirus bill

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Disabled people will be considered “expendable” under emergency government powers to cope with the coronavirus epidemic, Tanni Grey-Thompson fears.

In a bleak speech, the champion Paralympian highlighted how a bill about to be passed could result in “the complete removal of social care responsibilities” for at least two years.

The campaigner for disabled rights also raised fears of a drift to a register to decide which disabled people should receive services, as they shrivel.

“Decisions will be taken by someone else about our usefulness in the next few months that we will have no control over,” Baroness Grey-Thompson told the House of Lords.

“I am starting to worry that disabled people might be seen as expendable during this pandemic.”

Explaining her presence in the chamber, despite increased personal risk from the virus, she added: “This is a health and social care obliteration bill by a different name.”

Baroness Jane Campbell, former head of the Disability Rights Commission, echoed the fears, tweeting: “Disabled people must not be invisible in the survival planning process.”

And David Isaac, the chairman of the Equality and Human Rights Commission, said it was “concerned that the rights of all disabled people are respected”, adding: “We continue to monitor the situation.”

The warnings came as the Lords debated the coronavirus bill, which is being rushed through in a single day to allow parliament to be shut down on Wednesday night for four weeks.

Baroness Grey-Thompson said “part” of the legislation was needed, but raised fears over:

* Hard-pressed local authorities no longer assessing whether people require care, once the legal requirement is lifted.

* Disabled children turning 18 and finding their care help will “just stop”.

* Claimants of personal independent payments becoming “stuck in the appeal process” and losing vital cash.

* That it will be possible for a single medical professional to section someone under the Mental Health Act.

* A lack of support for victims of domestic violence, who “will be at greater risk”.

* TV advice on the epidemic being broadcast without “a sign language interpreter so that everybody can understand what is going on”.

“I have huge sympathy for what the government are trying to do right now, but a bill of this magnitude will be life-changing for disabled people,” she told ministers.

In response, Lord Bethell, a junior health minister, said Baroness Grey-Thompson had spoken “incredibly movingly”, but failed to answer her questions directly.

He said “local authorities and providers will do everything they can to continue to meet all needs”.

But he added: “We cannot rule out the possibility that, in the coming period, they will need to take difficult decisions and may need to be able to focus their resources on prioritising accordingly to meet the most urgent needs.”

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in