Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Jeremy Corbyn calls for end to 'poverty porn' TV shows like Benefits Street

Labour leader accuses programme makers of 'demonising' working class communities 

Benjamin Kentish
Tuesday 19 December 2017 02:01 GMT
Comments
Trailer for Channel 4's Benefit Street

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Jeremy Corbyn has backed calls for television shows that stereotype people on benefits to be scrapped.

The Labour leader said “poverty porn” programmes should be banished to history and accused their makers of “demonising” working-class communities.

He was speaking at a screening of a documentary, titled Dispossession, which looks at the loss of social housing in recent years and the consequences of the UK’s housing crisis.

During a Q&A session, Mr Corbyn was asked by the documentary’s maker, Paul Sng, for his views on programmes such as Channel 4’s Benefits Street, which followed the lives of several residents of James Turner Street in Birmingham.

The programme was the subject of hundreds of complaints, with many people accusing the makers of demonising deprived communities.

Raising the issue during the event with Mr Corbyn in West London, Mr Sng told the Labour leader: “If TV programmes stereotyped people with disabilities or people of colour the way they do working-class people, it wouldn’t be allowed.

“So let’s make poverty porn history. Let’s do this.”

Mr Corbyn replied: “You’re absolutely right. And the demonisation of communities makes it easier for politicians to make decisions that are damaging to those communities.

“Look at the underfunding of Grenfell, look at the way in which the Grenfell Action Group were not listened to when they should have been.”

Mr Sng suggested the Labour leader should contact Ofcom, the media regulator, to urge them to put a stop to the programmes.

A Labour source confirmed that Mr Corbyn wanted to see “fewer” programmes like Benefits Street and said he continued to support activists campaigning against “poverty porn”.

His intervention comes days after a television programme sparked a fierce row about a mother who spent £2,000 on Christmas presents for her six children.

Claire Young, who receives benefit payments, appeared on ITV’s This Morning and said she had bought her children 66 presents – 11 each. Despite the fact she had been able to afford the gifts by saving £50 each week and not drinking or smoking, some viewers criticised the mother for spending her benefit money on presents for her children.

Appearing on the show, she said: “I don’t drink, I don’t go out every weekend, I don’t take drugs, I hardly buy myself anything. Everything we get is the children’s money.”

“There are parents out there who are on benefits and who go out and spend every weekend out. But I don’t, I spend every waking minute with my children.

“I don’t like being on benefits. If I could go to work right now I would do, but just because I’m on benefits does that mean your children don’t get a Christmas?”

Ms Young is unable to work because she suffers from ME and fibromyalgia and is cared for by her husband. Responding to the criticism, a number of other viewers pointed out that Ms Young should be free to spend her money how she chooses, and praised her for prioritising her children’s happiness.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in