Consumer Focus quango will be missed
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Merging the Office of Fair Trading and the Competition Commission is sensible. They carry out different functions but in essence their task is the same: ensuring fair competition. Both are sluggish; merging them should speed them up.
Abolishing Consumer Focus, the publicly-funded consumer watchdog, is misguided. Most of its £14m-a-year budget, £9m, comes from industry and it is doing useful work on energy and postal services. It has won annual refunds of £15m on ISAs and £70m from npower. Passing its policy role to a voluntary body that delivers neighbourhood advice, Citizen's Advice, smacks of dogma.
The Government could create a better watchdog and save more by abolishing the Air Transport Users Council, Passenger Focus and Consumer Council for Water and hand their work to Consumer Focus. This would focus on five big industries: energy, post, water, rail and air travel, and be funded by levies on them, saving £20m more than the plan.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments