Commons to vote on Cook reform package
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Members of Parliament will vote later this month on far-reaching reforms of the House of Commons, Robin Cook, the Leader of the House, said yesterday.
They will hold a debate on 29 October on plans for early sittings and reforms of parliamentary questions.
The proposals include bringing the start of the parliamentary day forward from 2.30pm to 11.30am and ending at 7pm rather than 10pm.
Mr Cook is also proposing to reduce MPs' long summer break, with Parliament returning in September before the party conference season.
But modernisers in Parliament fear that traditionalists may overturn the reforms, which are designed to make the system more open.
Conservatives oppose parts of the reform package, arguing that they will make it easier for ministers to push through legislation by weakening the ability of the opposition to kill a Bill at the end of the Parliamentary session.
Eric Forth, the shadow Leader of the House, told MPs: "Sadly, this is not a matter which has been agreed by all parties as has been the case in the past.
"[Mr Cook] is bringing forward a number of proposals which do not have agreement. Is it too late at this stage for further discussion on this matter? When are we going to see the wording of these motions, arising from these very controversial matters."
Mr Cook said: "I think there comes a time when it is important to make a decision. I think on a matter that has been before the House for more than a year it is time to take a decision."
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments