Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Commons poised for chaotic night

Anthony Bevins
Wednesday 14 April 1993 23:02 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

THE COMMONS faces a night of possible confusion and chaos tonight, when it returns to committee stage examination of the Maastricht treaty legislation, writes Anthony Bevins.

It is expected that MPs will complete their consideration of Clause 1 of the three-clause European Communities (Amendment) Bill sometime between 7pm tonight and 7am tomorrow - at which point the House will start voting on relevant amendments.

But because Michael Morris, the Deputy Speaker who chairs the committee of the whole House, has insisted on playing his cards close to his chest, MPs will not know until this afternoon how many votes there will be. The House could vote for hours.

More importantly, MPs will not know until today whether Mr Morris has acceded to intense cross-party pressure to reverse his ruling that there is to be no vote on amendment 27. The amendment, proposing exclusion of John Major's Social Chapter opt-out from Clause 1, presents the Government with the real prospect of defeat on a substantive issue - although the Attorney General has advised ministers and the House that its passage would not stop ratification.

Because amendment 27 has been debated, it would be most unusual for there to be no vote on it.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in