Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Plans to allow more civil courts to sit in secret were pushed through the Commons last night in the face of protests from MPs of all parties that the moves would undermine basic principles of British justice.
Ministers defeated two moves by Labour and coalition rebels to introduce extra safeguards into the system – each time by majorities of more than 70.
Kenneth Clarke, the Minister without Portfolio, insists the "secret courts" are essential to allow highly sensitive material to be heard in private. He said judges would have "unfettered discretion" to decide whether to hear evidence in camera without being influenced by ministers.
But Conservative MP Andrew Tyrie said the defeated amendments were about "whether people can get to hear the case made against them and whether we can keep legal safeguards we have had for generations".
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments