Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Clegg: peers are holding Government hostage

Nigel Morris,Deputy Political Editor
Friday 14 January 2011 01:00 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

This election is still a dead heat, according to most polls. In a fight with such wafer-thin margins, we need reporters on the ground talking to the people Trump and Harris are courting. Your support allows us to keep sending journalists to the story.

The Independent is trusted by 27 million Americans from across the entire political spectrum every month. Unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock you out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. But quality journalism must still be paid for.

Help us keep bring these critical stories to light. Your support makes all the difference.

Nick Clegg faces a fresh crisis after his plans for sweeping reform of the House of Lords were savaged in a heated private meeting yesterday with peers.

In acrimonious clashes, they warned the Deputy Prime Minister that they would fight his proposals every step of the way.

One Tory MP joined the attack at the meeting, telling Mr Clegg that the issue could “paralyse” the coalition.

The Cabinet is expected to back moves to create an upper chamber that is 80 per cent elected, although some coalition ministers want to go further and make it fully elected.

The plans, likely to be set out within two months, will assume great importance for Mr Clegg if he loses the planned 5 May referendum on changing the voting system.

His critics were so strident in their opposition that Mr Clegg protested that he would not allow the Government to be held to ransom by opponents of Lords reform.

The show-down – described by one participant as “Daniel in the lion’s den” – came at a meeting between Clegg and members of a cross-party group campaigning against the plans. More than 50 peers from all major parties were present, including the former Liberal leader Lord Steel of Aikwood.

The MP for Harwich and North Essex, Bernard Jenkin, protested that overhauling the Lords would “paralyse” the coalition and that there was no demand within the Tory Party for the move.

He reminded Mr Clegg that David Cameron had described Lords reform as an issue for a Tory government only once it reached its third term in office.

Two former Tory Cabinet ministers tore into Mr Clegg’s plans. Lord Newton of Braintree called for Lords reform to be put to a public referendum, while Lord Howe of Aberavon said Mr Clegg’s description of the Lords was outdated.

A Labour peer, Lord Bilimoria, said there was no need for an elected senate challenging the supremacy of the Commons.

The former Tory MP, Baroness Knight of Collingtree, warned that the expertise of appointed peers, such as military officers and judges, would be lost if the Lords was reformed. Her argument was supported by Baron Ramsbotham, the former chief inspector of prisons.

Mr Clegg countered that there was clear public pressure for fundamental political reform in the wake of the MPs’ expenses scandal and did not want a “war of attrition” with peers on the subject. He told them: “It’s highly inappropriate to hold the government hostage on this.”

Meanwhile, the prospect is growing of the referendum on replacing first-past-the-post with the alternative vote being delayed beyond May 5 because of wrangling in the Lords. The Bill establishing the plebiscite needs to pass into law by mid-February.

But peers are holding it up because of objections over moves to cut the number of MPs, which are also included in the measure.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in