Your support helps us to tell the story
This election is still a dead heat, according to most polls. In a fight with such wafer-thin margins, we need reporters on the ground talking to the people Trump and Harris are courting. Your support allows us to keep sending journalists to the story.
The Independent is trusted by 27 million Americans from across the entire political spectrum every month. Unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock you out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. But quality journalism must still be paid for.
Help us keep bring these critical stories to light. Your support makes all the difference.
The failure to replace dangerous Grenfell-style cladding three years after the tragedy is "disgraceful", Boris Johnson has admitted.
The prime minister was asked during prime minister's questions on Wednesday what steps the government was taking to replace unsafe cladding on high-rise buildings, following as series of delays and criticism by watchdogs.
Ministers promised over a year ago that it would fund the replacement of cladding on high-rise private residential buildings, but many residents are still waiting for action.
Labour MP for Vauxhall Florence Eshalomi said the delay was leading hundreds of leaseholders across her consistencies "unable to sell or remortgage their properties".
The prime mister replied: "I am aware of this problem of people facing real disadvantage, leaseholders and others, because of the unsafe cladding still on their buildings.
"I think it is disgraceful, and both ACM and HPL cladding should, in my view, come off as fast as possible and we are investing massively to achieve that as fast we can. I sincerely appreciate the problem that she raises."
In May 2019 the government said it would provide £200 million funding to speed up cladding replacement hundreds of millions of pounds for for 170 privately-owned towers.
But rules for a further £1 billion cladding replacement fund unveiled in May this year excluded a number of buildings with combustible cladding that were previously assumed to be covered.
In some cases, leaseholders are known to have taken out loans worth tens of thousands of pounds to make their buildings safe in advance of assumed government cash.
The National Audit Office warned in June that the government was falling well behind on its promise to replace dangerous cladding.
The watchdog warned that “the pace of progress has lagged behind [the government’s] own expectations, particularly in the private residential sector”. It added that the government “It has a long way to go to make all high-rise buildings safe for residents.”
Subscribe to Independent Premium to bookmark this article
Want to bookmark your favourite articles and stories to read or reference later? Start your Independent Premium subscription today.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments