Civil service 'confusion' prolonged Moore scandal
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.The most senior official involved in the Jo Moore affair admitted yesterday that the scandal had "dogged" the Government for months because he advised Stephen Byers she could not be sacked under civil service rules.
Sir Richard Mottram admitted that he told Stephen Byers, who was secretary of state for transport, local government and the regions, that according to the civil service code her e-mail suggesting that 11 September would be a good day to bury bad new was not a serious enough offence to sack her.
He said Mr Byers asked him to examine the civil service disciplinary code and make a judgement about her future. But he said he should not have been asked to apply the civil service code to Ms Moore because she was a special adviser and not a civil servant.
"The reason it dogged the department for so long was because she wasn't a civil servant she was a special adviser," said Sir Richard, who was Permanent Secretary in the department at the time. Only Mr Byers had power to sack her.
Sir Richard was giving evidence yesterday to the Wicks committee examining the boundaries between special advisers and civil servants.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments