Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Civil servants 'compromised' their impartiality during the Scottish independence referendum with 'partisan' statements, MPs conclude

The committee of unionist MPs says the Treasury should not have released currency union advice

Jon Stone
Monday 23 March 2015 10:00 GMT
Comments
Supporters of a Yes vote in the Scottish independence referendum in Edinburgh in September 2013.
Supporters of a Yes vote in the Scottish independence referendum in Edinburgh in September 2013. (Andy Buchanan/AFP/Getty Images)

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

The perceived impartiality of Britain’s civil service was “compromised” by information released for “partisan purposes” during the Scottish independence referendum, an investigation by MPs has concluded.

A new report by the Public Administration Select Committee says the Treasury should never have published its advice about an independent Scotland sharing the pound.

“Sir Nicholas Macpherson's advice should not have been published. Its publication compromised the perceived impartiality of one of the UK's most senior civil servants,” the MPs concluded.

“The decision to publish will have unintended consequences for advice given to ministers on future major issues—including referendums. We invite the Government to make it clear in its response to this report that the publication of advice to ministers will never recur.”

First Minister Nicola Sturgeon had already accused the Treasury of being 'partisan'
First Minister Nicola Sturgeon had already accused the Treasury of being 'partisan' (PA)

The Committee also criticised a Scottish Government white paper, “Scotland’s Future”, whose content it says was dependent on the SNP winning the 2016 Scottish Parliament elections.

Nicholas Macpherson, the Treasury permanent secretary and its most senior civil servant, said earlier this year that he believed impartiality guidelines “do not apply” in “extreme” cases like the Scottish Independence referendum.

“Her Majesty’s Treasury is by its nature a unionist institution. The clue is in the name,” he told a meeting of the Strand Group at King’s College London.

SNP Treasury spokesperson Stewart Hosie at the time said the comments were “astounding” and wrote a letter to the head of the civil service Jeremy Heywood in protest.

Scotland’s First Minister this month accused the Treasury of a “pre-election partisan attack” after a separate incident in which the department released figures framed as critical of the SNP’s anti-austerity programme.

“It is clearly the case that the UK Government is including the SNP in political attacks prepared at taxpayers' expense - while continuing to exclude us from pre-election access to the civil service,” Nicola Sturgeon said.

“This inconsistency reeks of hypocrisy, as well as a Treasury which has become transparently party political.”

The Public Administration Select Committee is chaired by Conservative MP Bernard Jenkin. It comprises five Conservative MPs, five Labour MPs and one Liberal Democrat MP.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in