Tory MP Christopher Chope defends blocking bill to protect girls from FGM amid furious backlash
Sir Christopher Chope previously blocked bill to make upskirting a criminal offence
Your support helps us to tell the story
This election is still a dead heat, according to most polls. In a fight with such wafer-thin margins, we need reporters on the ground talking to the people Trump and Harris are courting. Your support allows us to keep sending journalists to the story.
The Independent is trusted by 27 million Americans from across the entire political spectrum every month. Unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock you out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. But quality journalism must still be paid for.
Help us keep bring these critical stories to light. Your support makes all the difference.
The Conservative MP Sir Christopher Chope has defended his decision to block a parliamentary bill designed to protect children from female genital mutilation (FGM).
Sir Christopher – who previously sparked outrage by blocking a bill to make upskirting a criminal offence – has been widely criticised for obstructing an FGM prevention bill in the House of Commons.
Crossbench peer Lord Berkeley of Knighton, who sponsored the FGM bill, said he was “furious” at the move and said it is “amazing that Chope can halt an important improvement”.
But the controversial MP for Christchurch in Dorset justified his objection on procedural grounds on Monday, suggesting the proposal had not been subject to proper debate.
Sir Christopher told BBC Radio 4’s Today programme that “bills should not go through on a nod on a second reading without debate”.
Lord Berkeley’s private members’ bill would have seen a one-line amendment to the Children’s Act 1989, which would “considerably extend protection to young girls” at greatest risk of genital mutilation.
The Labour peer said his bill had already been through “microscopic examination”.
Sir Christopher explained: “I sympathise enormously with the frustration of people campaigning to make sure the law is effective. I think there’s obviously a case for changing the law.”
However, the Tory MP does not believe private members’ bills are the proper way to amend legislation and said it is the role of government to introduce its own FGM bill.
In June he blocked the upskirting prevention bill – which has since been adopted as a governmental bill and is expected to pass in the coming months – for the same reason.
“In the same way as I was concerned about the upskirting issue ... I forced the government to introduce its own legislation,” said Sir Christopher. “I think that’s exactly what should happen in relation to this.”
Nimco Ali, founder of the anti-FGM charity Daughters of Eve, said Lord Berkeley’s bill would have allowed for more criminal prosecutions in relation to FGM.
“This is a simple protection order,” she said. “Preventing FGM is the only way to end FGM.”
Ms Ali also urged Sir Christopher to join the all-party parliamentary group against FGM and support future efforts to tackle the problem.
The Tory MP’s actions have also sparked an angry reaction on Twitter, with many people calling for him to be deselected.
Subscribe to Independent Premium to bookmark this article
Want to bookmark your favourite articles and stories to read or reference later? Start your Independent Premium subscription today.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments