Tory MP blames ‘anger and codeine’ after swearing at Owen Paterson

‘I’m not the only one who would have wanted to use language of that nature to him,’ says Christian Wakeford

Tom Batchelor
Sunday 21 November 2021 19:06 GMT
Comments
Related video: Owen Paterson broke lobbying rules, Boris Johnson admits

Support truly
independent journalism

Our mission is to deliver unbiased, fact-based reporting that holds power to account and exposes the truth.

Whether $5 or $50, every contribution counts.

Support us to deliver journalism without an agenda.

Louise Thomas

Louise Thomas

Editor

A Tory MP has admitted swearing at Owen Paterson earlier this month at the height of the standards row, saying the incident was fuelled by a mixture of “anger and codeine”.

Christian Wakeford was reported to have called his former Conservative colleague a “c***” during a vote in parliament.

Asked about the incident, the Bury South MP told Times Radio the report of him approaching Mr Paterson was correct, saying: “It’s been a mixture of quite a lot of anger and codeine. I clearly have a broken ankle at the moment, it’s not the best mix.

“But I do think it went to show ... the quantum of anger in the party, and that’s still high now.

“But the fact that after all that ... marching up to the top of the hill, not once was there gratitude from Owen, not once was there ... apologies or repentance. The fact he went out to the press and said ‘I will do exactly the same again’ – I think I’m not the only one who would have wanted to use language of that nature to him.”

Westminster has been engulfed by a sleaze row prompted by the government’s botched attempt to protect Mr Paterson from suspension over his breach of lobbying rules. Mr Paterson subsequently resigned as an MP, but the row has led to intense scrutiny of parliamentarians and their outside work.

Mr Wakeford, whose majority is just 402, told Times Radio that his inbox suggested there was a level of public anger at the saga. He added that even though the language in the row over standards had been toned down, the sentiment was still there.

“We should never have been in a position of that nature,” he said.

“And whether it was or it wasn’t, it felt like we were trying to get him off the hook when actually he was bang to rights in the report, so that didn’t sit comfortably with a lot of colleagues.”

Additional reporting by PA

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in