Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Labour MP could lose seat after sexual misconduct findings upheld

Andrew Woodcock
Political Editor
Friday 21 October 2022 11:47 BST
Comments
(UK Parliament)

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

A Labour MP is facing four weeks’ suspension from the Commons and a recall by-election after an inquiry upheld allegations of sexual misconduct against him.

Christian Matheson, MP for the City of Chester since 2015, was found to have put undue pressure on a female staff member to go on a “sexually motivated” trip overseas with him.

And he was found to have made “unwanted and unwelcome sexual advances” to the same woman - who is no longer working for him - during and after a corporate event outside parliament.

The Independent Expert Panel set up to investigation bullying and harassment allegations after the “Pestminster” scandal found that there was “ no doubt” that the MP was “seeking to initiate a sexual relationship with the complainant, his junior employee”.

The panel said: “This wished-for relationship was unwanted and unwelcome throughout. The evidence confirms that his actions were entirely non-consensual, as well as threatening, intimidating, undermining and humiliating for the complainant.

Mr Matheson, 54, appealed against the panel’s initial findings, but the appeal was dismissed as he had brought forward no substantive new evidence.

The panel’s recommendation of a four-week suspension must be confirmed by a vote in the House of Commons before taking effect.

If confirmed, the suspension would trigger a recall petition, allowing voters in his constituency to force a by-election.

Following an investigation by an independent investigator, the Parliamentary Commissioner for Standards Kathryn Stone upheld two allegations of sexual misconduct against Mr

She concluded that he had invited the complainant to take a private trip abroad, and “the invitation was sexually motivated, unwanted, and had placed the complainant under pressure and intimidated her”.

And she found during a work-related corporate event, he “linked arms with her; made personal comments about her appearance while looking at her suggestively; made her hold his hand as they left and insisted on accompanying her to her bus stop”.

Once at the bus stop, he “invited her back to his flat, kissed her twice on the forehead and attempted to kiss her on the mouth”.

The Commissioner concluded that these were all “unwanted and unwelcome sexual advances.”

Mr Matheson did not appeal the Commissioner’s decision, but contested some of her findings during the process of determining punishment.

Although it took into account the fact that Mr Matheson accepted that he had breached the sexual misconduct policy, the panel found that his “continuing failure to acknowledge the full extent of his misconduct [was] an aggravating factor” and “insulting to the complainant”.

“The clear imbalance of power” between Mr Matheson and the complainant, her vulnerability, and reliance on him for employment, were further serious aggravating factors.

It determined Mr Matheson should be suspended from the House for four weeks for a “serious breach of the Behaviour Code”.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in