Sovereignty ‘must not be up for sale,’ warn MPs as Welsh electronics plant bought by Chinese firm
‘We’ve witnessed too many of our country’s brilliant tech firms disappear abroad with potentially significant economic and foreign policy implications’
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.British sovereignty “must not be for sale,” MPs have warned as the UK’s largest electronic chip plant is bought by a Chinese company with links to the Beijing government.
The government must do much more to protect Britain’s strategic industrial assets, according to the Commons Foreign Affairs Committee.
It highlighted the takeover of Newport Wafer Fab (NWF) by Nexperia during a global chip shortage, a sale which means that the asset has passed into the hands of a company heavily backed by the Chinese Communist Party.
The Prime Minister has asked the National Security Advisor, Sir Stephen Lovegrove, to examine the buyout.
The Committee said in a report that “UK sovereignty must not be for sale.”
It added that the “failure to conduct a detailed assessment of this transaction under the National Security and Investment (NSI) Act would indicate that the government continues to hold an unrealistically optimistic understanding of the Chinese government’s intentions and is prioritising short-term commercial interests over the long-term security of our country.
“The case of NWF may yet serve to demonstrate that, despite the stated intentions of the NSI Bill, the government has not yet learned the lessons of previous years.”
Chair of the Committee, Conservative MP Tom Tugendhat MP, said: “Our fiercest competitors, notably China, have a track record of using foreign investments to gain access to important technologies and information.
“We’ve witnessed too many of our country’s brilliant tech firms disappear abroad with potentially significant economic and foreign policy implications.
“Why wasn’t the National Security Advisor involved in the first place? What new information prompted the Prime Minister to refer it to him....?”
Subscribe to Independent Premium to bookmark this article
Want to bookmark your favourite articles and stories to read or reference later? Start your Independent Premium subscription today.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments