Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Cherie attacks Blunkett plan

Nigel Morris,Home Affairs Correspondent
Friday 03 October 2003 00:00 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Cherie Blair has backed fears that David Blunkett's plans to crack down on teenage yobbery represents an attack on the freedom of the young.

She joined delegates who denounced provisions in the Home Secretary's flagship Anti-Social Behaviour Bill enabling police to break up groups of youngsters aged under 16 or to take them home if they are found out alone in public after 9pm. The Bill is going through the Lords.

The plans were criticised by most activists in a survey conducted by the Children's Society at the conference.

A total of 77 per cent said they were concerned that young people would be unable to enjoy the same freedom they had as a child, and more than half called for local communities to be consulted before police were given these new powers. Nine out of 10 admitted that as teenagers they met up with friends in public places and went home alone after 9pm.

Mrs Blair, a human rights lawyer, replied "yes" to all the questions. Three years ago, her son Euan was picked up by police in London after getting drunk to celebrate the end of his exams.

The measures have been denounced by children's groups as in effect imposing a curfew on teenagers and as a potential breach of their human rights.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in