Case study: The middle-income family
'Increased spending will not stop terror'
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Phil and Barbara Cullimore. Son, James
Mrs Cullimore: Senior benefits liaison officer for Wokingham district council, Mr Cullimore: credit controller for INS
Home: Wokingham, Berkshire, with £220,000 four-bedroom house
Age: Mr Cullimore, 51; Mrs Cullimore, 50; James, 15
Income: £42,000; £25,000 Mrs Cullimore, £17,000 Mr Cullimore
Savings: £10,000
Company benefits: Contributory pension scheme
Outgoings (per month): £100 pension, £70 season ticket, £520 mortgage
Politics: Usually a Conservative voter, but unsure about election
Budget hopes: Hopes motorists are not hit again; the road fund licence is scrapped but fuel costs increased. Would like to see inventive solutions to fill the deficit from the Iraq war, rather than a hike in National Insurance.
Actual effect of Budget: Mr and Mrs Cullimore are £124 richer in 2004-05. Their NI and tax will decrease, by £29 and £72 respectively. Their child benefit will increase by £23.
"We are happy about that. The Budget was neutral this year; there was nothing immediately, wildly alarming. I am not convinced by the increased spending to protect us against terrorism. We can spend all we like protecting ourselves, but if a terrorist wants to attack, they will. The Madrid bombs only prove that.
"I think the Civil Service is over-manned; whether sacking and relocating staff will be effective, I am really not sure. I am pleased to notice the provisions for pensioners. My mother and mother-in-law will benefit, because they are over 70. Brown has obviously done a lot of work on his figures, because he has differentiated between those who are 65 and the 70-year-olds. He must have worked out that we couldn't afford to help out all pensioners. But it is confusing; why is an 80-year-old more deserving than someone of 70, or of 65?
"The money for schools is much needed. I am glad most of the money is going to primary and secondary schools, because that benefits everyone. The last thing I want to see is more money going into further education. Not everyone goes to university, yet everyone deserves a good basic education, which I am not convinced is available throughout the country."
Genevieve Roberts
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments