Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Campbell rebukes senior colleagues for 'crude anti-Americanism' in Iraq debate

Nigel Morris Political Correspondent
Thursday 26 September 2002 00:00 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Menzies Campbell, the Liberal Democrat foreign affairs spokesman, delivered a pointed rebuke yesterday to senior party figures for indulging in "crude anti-Americanism".

His attack came as the party unanimously backed a motion supporting military action in Iraq only as "a last resort" and registering fears over the consequences for the Middle East peace process of attacks on Baghdad. It said the dossier published by the Government did not contain "evidence of immediate threat" by Saddam Hussein's regime.

Opening an emergency debate on Iraq, Mr Campbell revealed his frustration over the frequent anti-American language used during the Brighton conference.

He said: "Let me begin with what may seem like a reproof. We must not allow our legitimate questions about the foreign policy of the US administration to find expression in crude anti-Americanism.

"This is not the time for children of the Sixties, like myself, to get out our Bob Dylan records and replay the old anti-Vietnam War slogans."

After his speech Mr Campbell said: "There have been one or two expressions this week of a more anti-American bias than is consistent with the Liberal Democrats' traditional support for the Europe/America relationship and for Nato.

"I'm anxious to conduct this debate on its merits and we do not allow ourselves to fall into sloganising."

His targets appeared to include Malcolm Bruce, the environment spokesman, who denounced President George Bush earlier this week for his "high-volume rhetoric to justify war against Iraq" and America's "arrogant defiance" over the Kyoto Treaty on global warming.

Mr Campbell told delegates: "If there is to be military action, it must be a last resort when all other avenues have been exhausted. It must be consistent with international law. It must be authorised by the UN and endorsed by the House of Commons."

He also reiterated the party's opposition to Washington's determination to topple President Saddam. He said: "I know of no principle of international law which authorises regime change by means of military force."

Qassim Afzal, from Manchester, said the crisis had left British Muslims feeling "demonised and victimised". It was driving "a wedge between friends and a dagger between communities".

Gareth Epps, from Witney in Oxfordshire, said President Saddam was a monster created by the West's "greed for oil 20 years ago". It had supplied him with the chemical weapons he used to such deadly effect.

Susan Kramer, the former Liberal Democrat candidate for London Mayor, said: "Let's test the good faith of Saddam Hussein and let's have a new UN resolution and start the Middle East peace process."

Earlier yesterday, Charles Kennedy, the Liberal Democrat leader, expressed concern that there was "no killer fact" in the Downing Street dossier on Iraq. He described it as "more a confirmation of what we already knew: this is a very dangerous man and a very unstable situation and the issue has got to be addressed".

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in