Cameron condemns 'leaky' defence department
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.David Cameron slapped down his Defence Secretary Liam Fox yesterday for running a "leaky" department as the Government was embroiled in a "spin row" over its big cuts in defence spending.
The Prime Minister took a sideswipe at Mr Fox, whose letter to him warning about "grave" consequences from "draconian" defence cuts was leaked at a sensitive time during the spending review.
"That department does seem to have had a bit of a problem with leaks, which is worrying when it is the department responsible for security," Mr Cameron told the Liaison Committee of senior MPs during his first grilling by it since becoming Prime Minister. He said leaked letters did not help the review by adding to the public pressures, but believed that Mr Fox's strongly worded protest did not have a "huge impact".
Mr Cameron angered some of the MPs by admitting the Government may have urged the heads of the armed forces publicly to defend the decision to axe Britain's Harrier jet fleet. He said he "would not be at all surprised" if Downing Street had played a role in instigating a letter they wrote hitting back at a group of former service chiefs who criticised the decision to keep the Tornado fighter bombers rather than the Harriers.
Andrew Tyrie, chairman of the Treasury Select Committee, said: "I would find it unacceptable if it turns out that No 10 did prompt the chiefs of staff to enter political controversy in that way." It is understood that it was Mr Fox's idea to persuade the service heads to endorse the Cabinet's decision. No 10 was informed about the plan.
The Prime Minister also found himself at odds with Mr Fox over whether the decision to delay a decision on renewing Britain's Trident nuclear missile system until 2015 would save or cost money. Mr Cameron told the MPs the move would save £3bn over the next 10 years. But Margaret Hodge, who chairs the Public Accounts Committee, said the decision would cost up to £1.4bn – a figure volunteered to MPs last week by Mr Fox, who said keeping the ageing Vanguard submarines in service until 2028 would increase maintenance costs.
The Defence Secretary is believed to have wanted to press ahead with renewing Trident, but Mr Cameron agreed to postpone a decision in a major concession to Nick Clegg.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments