Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Call to introduce new code of conduct for peers

Fran Abrams,Westminster Correspondent
Thursday 30 March 2000 00:00 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

The gentleman's code which has guided the behaviour of peers for centuries must be changed because new members are being recruited from such a wide range of sources, the Government's standards watchdog has decided.

As Tony Blair announces the names of 34 new working peers today, 19 of them Labour, Lord Neill of Bladen is to call for a full code of conduct for the House of Lords.

While MPs have a detailed code which says they must not be beholden to any outside organisation that might influence them, peers are supposed "to act always on their personal honour."

In a document to be published on Tuesday, Lord Neill will say the Government's drive to "cast its net wider than the present system" in recruiting peers is bound to cause problems.

His paper, which will open a formal inquiry into the financial interests of peers and their conduct by Lord Neill's Committee on Standards in Public Life, will say the new breed of peer is bound to need firmer guidance than the traditional type.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in