Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Brooke in surcharge warning

Steve Boggan
Thursday 23 February 1995 00:02 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Peter Brooke, the former chairman of the Conservative Party, added his voice yesterday to claims that the Westminster homes-for-votes inquiry would deter people from becoming councillors, writes Steve Boggan.

Acting in concert with Westminster councillors who lobbied their district auditor, Mr Brooke - MP for the City of London and Westminster South - expressed concern that councillors could be surcharged and disqualified for implementing policies that had been legally cleared by council officers.

Nine Westminster councillors face millions of pounds in surcharges if John Magill, the district auditor, decides later this year that their policy of attracting potential Tory voters to marginal wards amounted to wilful misconduct, even though it was cleared by lawyers.

Mr Brooke said it was unfair that councillors whose decisions were challenged in court did not enjoy the same privileges as government ministers. They had to pay for their own legal representation and were personally liable for any money they were deemed to have misused.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in