Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

British civilian is killed in Iraq

Terri Judd
Saturday 21 January 2006 01:00 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

A British civilian has been killed in an explosion in Iraq. The news emerged as the Defence Secretary, John Reid, revealed for the first time that 230 British troops have been wounded in action since the invasion of Iraq began in 2003.

Stephen Enright, 29, from Exeter, Devon, was killed when an explosive hit the vehicle in which he was travelling on Thursday. He was employed by the London-based Armor Group, a subcontractor providing security to the Environmental Chemical Corporation, of Colorado.

Mr Reid was visiting injured British soldiers at a military rehabilitation clinic in south London yesterday, where he was confronted by Sue Norton, whose husband, Captain Peter Norton, lost an arm and a leg in a bomb blast.

She asked why the Ministry of Defence, unlike the Pentagon, do not publish details of combat injuries. In reply, Mr Reid said that of the 230 soldiers, 40 had been injured seriously. Little has been said about injuries suffered by troops. Mr Reid said categorising the injured, wounded and sick was simply not a priority for forces in Iraq.

Disclosure of the figures prompted renewed calls for greater transparency as well as scepticism from some quarters. Peter Kilfoyle, a former defence minister, said: "If there is an attempt to play down the nature or the number of these injuries, it is to be deplored."

Speaking on a visit to Headley Court defence medical rehabilitation centre, Mr Reid said: "I get bowled over by the courage, enthusiasm and endurance of ordinary squaddies. People have the most traumatic experiences, have lost limbs, and what they want to do is get rehabilitated and get back into the services."

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in