Your support helps us to tell the story
This election is still a dead heat, according to most polls. In a fight with such wafer-thin margins, we need reporters on the ground talking to the people Trump and Harris are courting. Your support allows us to keep sending journalists to the story.
The Independent is trusted by 27 million Americans from across the entire political spectrum every month. Unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock you out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. But quality journalism must still be paid for.
Help us keep bring these critical stories to light. Your support makes all the difference.
One of Britain’s leading business organisations has called on the Government to change its deficit targets so that they do not include spending on infrastructure.
The British Chambers of Commerce criticised the “demonisation of debt” in public discourse and said the state should really be borrowing to invest in useful projects.
“The BCC continues to support the government’s attempts to eliminate the deficit. However, the ‘demonisation of debt’, particularly public sector debt, has made justification for public investment more difficult in the current economic climate,” said John Longworth, the organisation’s director general.
“This is why we believe that any move to constrain future spending should explicitly exclude infrastructure, which is an investment rather than just a cost. This could be achieved through the removal of infrastructure investment of national importance from the national debt targets.”
The organisation’s position is now very close to that of Labour’s shadow chancellor John McDonnell, who said he endorsed aspects of George Osborne’s fiscal charter – but not on capital spending, which includes infrastructure.
In September Mr McDonnell revealed his support for a balanced current budget, but branded Mr Osborne’s plan to run a surplus on capital spending as “economic illiteracy”.
The shadow chancellor originally planned vote for the Chancellor’s budget charter, but performed a self-confessed U-turn and voted against it in what he described as a change of “tactics”.
He said the difference between Labour and the Conservatives is that Labour would reduce the deficit by targeting the wealthy rather than the poorest.
Mr Longworth made the comments in an article included in a report called “Bursting the Bubble” – highlighting ten ways the organisation believes Westminster gets economic policy wrong.
The Chancellor has passed a law that would commit the Government to running budget surpluses during “normal times”. He has accused Labour of wanting “to spend money we don't have and borrow for ever”.
Most normally-functioning national governments in develop countries constantly borrow money, with budget surpluses a rare occurrence.
The UK can currently borrow at very low interest rates meaning projects funded by borrowing that generate a return or sufficient increased economic activity are likely to be self-funding.
Subscribe to Independent Premium to bookmark this article
Want to bookmark your favourite articles and stories to read or reference later? Start your Independent Premium subscription today.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments