Britain's spying shame
Fury at claims Britain spied on UN
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Britain faced deep international embarrassment last night after the former cabinet minister Clare Short claimed that its security services spied on Kofi Annan, the United Nations secretary general, in the run-up to last year's Iraq war.
A furious Tony Blair condemned Ms Short as "deeply irresponsible" and accused her of threatening Britain's national security by attacking the security services. Last night she returned to the attack, claiming that the Prime Minister had stopped short of denying her claims because he knew that they were true.
There was speculation at Westminster last night that the bugging was carried out by American security services but that Mr Blair did not wish to say so for fear of upsetting the Bush administration.
In New York, British officials made frantic efforts to reassure Mr Annan and his team about the conduct of the security services. The UN said that if the bugging claim was true, the action was illegal and should end immediately. "We want this action to stop if indeed it has been carried out," Mr Annan's spokesman, Fred Eckhard, said.
Spying activities would undermine the confidential nature of diplomatic exchanges, he said. People speaking to Mr Annan were "entitled to assume that their exchanges were confidential". He added: "We would be disappointed if this were true. We are throwing down a red flag and saying, 'If this is true, then stop it'."
Mr Annan has every reason to feel personally betrayed by the British, with whom he has close relations, and who have been strong supporters of him as secretary general.
Mr Blair was thrown on to the defensive at his monthly Downing Street press conference. He struggled to answer Ms Short's unprecedented allegation and explain the decision to drop the case against the GCHQ whistleblower Katharine Gun. Some Labour MPs expressed concern that his failure to give clear answers - which he put down to national security and legal reasons - would add to his "trust problem" with the public.
The former international development secretary, who resigned from the Cabinet after the war, stunned the political establishments on both sides of the Atlantic when she claimed on BBC Radio 4 that Britain had spied on the UN chief during the critical period when it was seeking a second UN resolution to give authority for military action.
Asked whether British intelligence was involved, she said: "I have seen transcripts of Kofi Annan's conversations. In fact I have had conversations with Kofi in the run-up to war, thinking: 'Oh dear. There will be a transcript of this and people will see what he and I are saying.'"
Mr Blair refused to comment on any intelligence operations, but insisted that they were conducted in line with domestic and international law. He stressed that he was not confirming that Ms Short's allegation about the security services was true. "It really is the height of irresponsibility to expose them to this type of public questioning and scrutiny in a way that can do absolutely no good to the security of this country," he said.
Ms Short rejected calls by Labour MPs for her to keep silent by going even further in another interview last night. On Channel 4 News, she dismissed Mr Blair's criticism of her as a "distraction" and declared that it was the Prime Minister who had brought the security services into disrepute by exaggerating their account of the threat posed by Iraq.
"There is no British national security involved in revealing that Kofi Annan's private phone calls have been improperly revealed and there is no danger to British security services by making this public," she said. Asked if Britain was intercepting Mr Annan's calls, she said: "No. We are getting transcripts of them and I think that's wrong and is disrespectful."
Some Labour MPs suggested she should be disciplined by the party, be prosecuted under the Official Secrets Act or lose her status as a privy councillor. She responded that she was "not trembling in her shoes".
Mr Blair said he would consider disciplinary action but his advisers believe that removing the Labour whip from Ms Short would merely turn her into a martyr and prolong the party's divisions over Iraq.
Last night, Downing Street announced a review of the Official Secrets Act amid concern that it could be impossible to mount a prosecution of someone who leaked information in the hope of averting military conflict. Mr Blair will again try to switch the spotlight back to domestic issues in a speech to the Scottish Labour conference today, but faces further turmoil over Iraq.
Michael Howard, the Tory leader, said: "I'm afraid the situation seems to be a complete mess. It's about time the Prime Minister got a grip on it."
Charles Kennedy, the Liberal Democrat leader, urged Mr Blair to "come clean" about whether Britain bugged Mr Annan's office. "He cannot use the security services as a shield to duck this question."
There were claims yesterday that Lord Goldsmith QC, the Attorney General, had changed his stance about the legality of war weeks before the conflict.
Subscribe to Independent Premium to bookmark this article
Want to bookmark your favourite articles and stories to read or reference later? Start your Independent Premium subscription today.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments