Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.British Brexit negotiators are reportedly resisting Brussels demands for the UK to implement all new EU laws during the transition period without any say over their content.
Leaked instructions to European Commission negotiators, set to be confirmed later on Monday, show Brussels will insist on the UK adopting all rules to preserve the integrity of the EU single market.
This would happen despite the UK having no EU commissioners, MEPs, and no seat on the council. The UK would also have no automatic right to attend meetings where regulations were agreed.
But the Financial Times reports that the UK wants to be able to at least vet laws before they come in. A senior Brussels official told the newspaper the UK was “wasting everyone’s time” trying to find a way to influence EU regulations from outside the bloc – especially considering both sides want to agree the transition deal by March.
The row comes after anger on the Tory right that the UK could become a “vassal state” of the EU after it leaves the EU, implementing laws and regulations with no say over them for years.
More fuel was added to the fire at the weekend after it emerged that UK negotiators were open to the possibility of an even longer transition period than the one suggested by the European Commission.
One vetting system is used in the European Economic Area, whose nations also implement EU rules without much say in deciding them. The EEA joint committee, which includes representatives from EEA states outside the EU, decides on how to amend the EEA agreement to shadow EU laws, though in practice it has little power to actually change regulations.
Updated guidelines for chief negotiator Michel Barnier dated 22 January 2018 specifically state that “as a general rule, the UK will not attend meetings” of key committees involved in drafting European regulations.
EU negotiators are set to insist that “exceptionally, on case-by-case basis” other EU states could “invite” Britain to observe a meeting without any right to influence its content – but only if it is in the interests of the EU, or the issue is solely about the UK.
Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn also said yesterday he wanted the UK to “have influence over the regulations” it would implement after Brexit – in this case referring to long-term regulatory alignment.
Subscribe to Independent Premium to bookmark this article
Want to bookmark your favourite articles and stories to read or reference later? Start your Independent Premium subscription today.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments