Brexit: Theresa May accuses Labour of dragging its heels in talks to find compromise
No 10 goes public on fears that Jeremy Corbyn does not share a desire to avoid next month’s European elections
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Theresa May has accused Labour of dragging its heels in the bid to find a cross-party compromise to deliver Brexit, even before the talks resumed after Easter.
“The discussions with Labour have been serious but had also been difficult in some areas, such as in relation to the timetable for the negotiations,” the prime minister told her cabinet.
No 10 fears Jeremy Corbyn does not share Ms May’s desire to avoid next month’s European parliament elections – which would require an agreement within days.
The criticism is striking because it is the first time the government has turned on Labour since approaching the opposition three weeks ago.
Until now, it has been Mr Corbyn’s party that has blamed the prime minister for the lack of progress, accusing her of refusing to shift on her red lines – in particular, membership of a customs union.
The cabinet discussion took place even before the talks resumed on Tuesday afternoon – but after a failure to hold any meaningful negotiations last week.
Ms May’s spokesman told journalists: “The PM said the discussions with Labour had been serious, but had also been difficult in some areas, such as in relation to the timetable for the negotiations.
“The PM said that the government’s position was that progress needed to be made urgently as it was vital to deliver on the result of the referendum and for the UK to leave the European Union as soon as possible.”
Asked if the reference to difficulties being caused by the “timetable” referred to Labour not wanting them to conclude as quickly as the government wanted, the spokesman said such an interpretation was “reasonable”.
But he rejected a suggestion that meant Labour was guilty of “bad faith”, adding: “Labour has approached [the talks] in a serious manner and has been engaging constructively.”
The cabinet met ahead of David Lidington, Mrs May’s de facto deputy, and Stephen Barclay, the Brexit secretary, meeting Keir Starmer, his Labour shadow, and John McDonnell, the shadow chancellor.
Downing Street is increasingly gloomy about the chances of a breakthrough, given there is no obvious reason for Mr Corbyn to help the prime minister escape the Brexit crisis.
The Tories are heading for a disastrous defeat on 23 May, amid Nigel Farage’s resurgence at the head of the new Brexit Party.
But it appears impossible for the prime minister to concede a customs union, which would split her party and could hasten her ejection from Downing Street.
One possibility is to bring forward the withdrawal agreement bill as early as next week, to keep open the slim possibility of full ratification by 22 May.
“It’s a piece of legislation that is required,” Ms May’s spokesman said. “We have been working on the withdrawal agreement bill for a significant amount of time.”
However, No 10 knows that, if the bill was thrown out – a strong probability, without a deal with Labour – it would be forced to prorogue parliament and start a new session, threatening the fracturing alliance with the Democratic Unionist Party.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments