No-deal Brexit would leave households almost £1,000 worse off, new report suggests
Households will face higher prices as they absorb costs from labour changes, tariffs, and red tape, it says
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Leaving the European Union (EU) without a trade deal could leave British households almost £1,000 worse off a year, according to a new report.
If Britain left the bloc and reverted back to World Trade Organisation (WTO) rules, there would be import tariffs and the UK would leave the EU Customs Union and the Single Market.
As a result each household is likely to be £960 worse off, the report by multi-national consulting firm Oliver Wyman has suggested.
However, the exact size of the annual impact would vary between £245 and that amount, depending on the type of trade deal the UK gets and whether it can avoid EU tariffs,
Households will face higher prices as they absorb costs from labour changes, tariffs, and red tape, it said, whilst consumer businesses could see profits slump by one to four per cent.
A report by the House of Lords European Union Committee said food prices are likely to rise after Brexit if no trade agreement with the EU is reached and that there could be shortages of some products.
The news comes as Brexiteer Andrea Leadsom admitted that quitting without an agreement would not be an "optimal solution".
She told The House magazine: "The EU has simply not taken us seriously so far in terms of the future agreement. What this deal does is it says to them, 'right, now we can have a free trading area where there won't be the need for border checks and controls'.
"It's saying to the EU, 'you better take this seriously'. In my view, it's take this seriously or we are heading for no deal. The message to the EU has to be, 'this is the final offer'.
"So, when you say, 'is it flexible?', it's not in the sense of they're going to wriggle away at it and we're going to accept it. It is a very hard and fast offer to the EU that makes sense for them. But if they don't accept it, we're also ramping up our no deal preparations. That's where we will be heading and they will have forced us to do that.
She added: "My message to the EU is, 'take this seriously because otherwise, you're forcing us down the road of no deal'."
Agencies contributed to the report
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments