Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Brexit legal challenge: Men talk for 99.3% of court challenge so far

During 4 and a half hours of legal proceedings, women addressed the court for a total of 1 minute and 21 seconds

Siobhan Fenton
Social Affairs Correspondent
Tuesday 06 December 2016 16:07 GMT
Comments
(PA wire)

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Anyone watching the ongoing Supreme Court appeal about triggering Article 50 could hardly fail to notice one thing- contributions to the case have almost entirely come from men.

Women spoke for just 1 minute and 21 seconds during 4 and a half hours of legal proceedings during the first day of the Supreme Court Brexit case.

By comparison, men spoke for 4 hours, 28 minutes and 39 seconds. This amounts to men talking for 99.3 per cent of proceedings.

The Supreme Court is considering whether MPs will be entitled to vote on whether to trigger Article 50, in what is widely considered to be one of the most important constitutional legal cases this decade.

Of 11 Supreme Court judges hearing the case, just one is female; Lady Brenda Hale. The Government is also only represented by male legal representatives in the case; Jeremy Wright QC, James Eadie QC, Lord Keen QC and John Larkin QC.

All but one of the lawyers representing appellants and interested parties are also male. The exception is Helen Mountfield QC, who represent the crowdfunded Peoples’ Challenge in the case against the Government and is due to address the court later this week.

Despite recent attempts within the legal profession to increase equality of opportunity and diversity among top judges, the overwhelming majority remain white, privately educated men who have graduated from Oxford or Cambridge. In addition to 91 per cent of Supreme Court judges being male, all are white, 82 per cent were privately educated and 82 per cent have degrees from Oxford or Cambridge universities.

Follow our correspondent Siobhan Fenton's live coverage of the Brexit case from inside the Supreme Court on our live blog

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in