Brexit: We need a vote in Parliament to start Article 50, says former Attorney-General Dominic Grieve
MP says Government can't make such a big decision without parliamentary approval
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.The UK’s former attorney general has said the Government would need Parliament’s approval to trigger Article 50.
Dominic Grieve said it is “extremely farfetched” to believe the Government could “take a decision of such massive importance to the United Kingdom” without getting the approval of Parliament.
Speaking on the BBC’s Sunday Politics programme, the former barrister said: “We undoubtedly need a vote in Parliament. It is a matter of convention.
“The idea that a government could take a decision of such massive importance to the United Kingdom without parliamentary approval seems to me to be extremely farfetched.
“It’s not about law it is about convention and reality.”
Mr Grieve said he would vote for triggering Article 50 – which starts the negotiation process for a country to leave the EU – despite campaigning for Remain because the result of the referendum was “quite clear”.
But he added that “the decision has to be right at the time you make it” and said circumstances could change.
Echoing earlier comments on the legality of a second referendum he said: “The justification for a second referendum is if the circumstances at the time justify the need to put it to the electorate.”
He said a referendum was “exactly the same as a general election” in that the result reflected the will of the people at that particular point in time.
The Beaconsfield MP said Prime Minister Theresa May should only trigger Article 50 when there was “some clarity” as to what the “scope of the negotiations that will follow”.
He said: “Clearly if our European partners don’t want us to negotiate at all informally prior to triggering Article 50 that might present some difficulties.
“What it is that the United Kingdom is seeking in terms of a future relationship with the EU is very important. I think it is impossible to give a problem timescale.
“The Prime Minister needs to be given maximum flexibility about this to prevent boxing herself in to what is going to be the most difficult political transformation this country has gone through in modern times.”
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments