Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Brexit: Young EU migrants could be given two-year work visas 'to boost economy' after UK leaves

'Younger migrants have a longer working life ahead of them so have a higher chance of making a net positive contribution to the public finances', report says

Rachel Roberts
Saturday 05 August 2017 18:12 BST
Comments
Young Europeans aged 18-30 could still be granted two-year working visas to the UK under proposals from a committee advising the Government on post-Brexit migration policy
Young Europeans aged 18-30 could still be granted two-year working visas to the UK under proposals from a committee advising the Government on post-Brexit migration policy (Getty)

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

EU migrants aged under 30 could be given two-year visas that allow them to live and work in the UK post-Brexit under economic contingency proposals being considered by the Government.

Independent body the Migration Advisory Commission has been asked by ministers to examine the likely economic impact of the imminent exit from the EU which is set to end freedom of movement to and from the UK.

In its call for evidence, published this week, the committee suggests the UK economy could benefit by giving preferential treatment to younger migrants, who are likely to have a longer working life ahead of them and to pay more into the tax system than they take from it – for example, because they are less likely to have long-term health problems.

This proposal is similar to the migration policies of countries such as New Zealand, Australia and Canada, which have more relaxed entry requirements for temporary workers aged under 30.

The report states that younger workers are believed to integrate more successfully into host countries than those who arrive when they are older.

“Younger migrants have a longer working life ahead of them so have a higher chance of making a net positive contribution to the public finances, and they are perhaps considered to assimilate more successfully”.

The report raises the possibility of an Australian-style points-based system for would-be immigrants after Brexit, with many businesses expressing concerns they will not be able to recruit the workers they need once freedom of movement ends.

It suggests younger migrants would receive more points, or be given a lower salary threshold for the amount they must earn before they are allowed to settle in the UK.

It points to the current Youth Mobility Scheme that allows people aged 18-30 from nations including Australia, Canada, Japan and New Zealand, to live and work in the UK on a two-year visa.

The report also suggests that regional variations should be taken into account when deciding salary thresholds for those wanting to come to the UK.

And the report suggests low-skilled migration should be curbed in favour of allowing those with specific, in-demand skills to come to the UK, in common with countries including Australia and the US.

“The economic literature suggests that migrants are more likely to have beneficial economic effects when they have different skills from the resident population,” it says.

It adds that there are likely to be positives as well as negatives to both the general population and to businesses through reducing low-skilled migration.

“Sectors and businesses are likely to react differently to a reduction in low-skilled migration. On the one hand, a reduction in the supply of low-skilled migrants might push up wages and costs to businesses, which could translate into higher prices for consumers. On the other hand, a reduction of fairly cheap low-skilled migrants could force businesses to substitute labour for capital, boosting productivity.”

It also suggests that seasonal worker schemes could help the UK economy.

“There are some sectors where the demand for labour is very seasonal. In some cases, a large amount of labour may be required in a very specific place for a short period of time.”

The number of EU migrants working in the UK has more than quadrupled since 2004 from around 600,000 to more than 2 million today.

In the wake of the EU referendum, however, the ONS found that around 117,000 EU citizens left the UK in 2016, an increase of 31,000 on 2015 and the highest recorded estimate since 2009.

Those who left were mostly from EU8 countries – a group which includes Poland, the Czech Republic, the Baltic states and Hungary.

With the clock ticking on the UK’s exit in March 2019, Home Secretary Amber Rudd has said that EU nationals will still be able to come to the UK during a transitional period after Brexit but will have to go through a “registration and documentation” process rather than having an automatic right to enter.

It was an attempt to reassure business there will be no “cliff edge” for the current migration system, although free movement will end as a point of principle when the UK leaves the 28-state block.

Ms Rudd laid out the Government’s proposals in a letter to the committee looking at migration, in which she said that after the transition period, the UK would find a new relationship with the EU.

“We will move to the third phase, which will be our long-term arrangements covering the migration of EU citizens, designed according to economic and social needs at the time, and reflecting our future deep and special partnership with the EU.

“The Government will want to ensure that decisions on the long-term arrangements are based on evidence. The commission that we are now asking the (Migration Advisory Committee] to undertake is very much part of this.”

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in