Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Theresa May admits she was wrong to say EU nationals ‘jump the queue’ to enter the UK

Prime minister backtracks as she reveals ‘meaningful vote’ on her Brexit deal will take place on Tuesday 11 December  

Rob Merrick
Deputy Political Editor
Monday 26 November 2018 19:13 GMT
Comments
Theresa May apologies for previously saying EU citizens had 'jumped the queue' under current immigration rules

Your support helps us to tell the story

This election is still a dead heat, according to most polls. In a fight with such wafer-thin margins, we need reporters on the ground talking to the people Trump and Harris are courting. Your support allows us to keep sending journalists to the story.

The Independent is trusted by 27 million Americans from across the entire political spectrum every month. Unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock you out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. But quality journalism must still be paid for.

Help us keep bring these critical stories to light. Your support makes all the difference.

Theresa May admitted she was wrong to say EU nationals “jump the queue” to work in the UK, as she revealed the date when MPs will decide the fate of her Brexit deal.

The “meaningful vote” will take place on Tuesday 11 December, at the close of five days of debate – and just two days before the prime minister heads to Brussels for another EU summit.

The date was announced as the agreement faced another torrent of criticism from all sides in the Commons, pointing to a heavy defeat and an unprecedented political crisis.

Making a statement, Ms May again refused to set out a “plan B”, as her aides insisted she was focused entirely on changing enough minds to win the vote against all the odds.

But she did backtrack on her controversial comment – to the CBI conference last week – that EU migrants will “no longer” be able to “jump the queue”, ahead of migrants from the rest of the world.

The remark triggered a storm of criticism, being branded “offensive” and “disgraceful” by Nicola Sturgeon, the Scottish first minister, and the fuel for hate crime by a leading academic.

In the Commons, the SNP’s Philippa Whitford protested it was insulting to people like her doctor husband, a German national, who has been in the UK for 30 years making a contribution.

In reply, Ms May told MPs: “I should not have used that language in that speech.”

The comment was a clumsy reference to the government’s intention to introduce a new immigration system after 2020, when free movement is due to end, treating EU and non-EU migrants equally.

The date of the meaningful vote was set out in a letter to Conservative MPs from Julian Smith, the chief whip, which also highlighted a “number of three-line whips” during the following week.

If, as seems certain, the deal is rejected, Labour has said it will push for a general election by tabling a vote of no confidence in the government soon afterwards.

The number of Tory MPs speaking out against the deal has now reached 95, and hopes of Labour support have melted away – pointing to a humiliation for the prime minister who negotiated it.

In the Commons, the ranks of the Tory rebels appeared to be bolstered by Michael Fallon, the former defence secretary, who said the UK would be “surrendering our vote and our veto”, with nothing concrete in return.

Jeremy Corbyn made clear Labour’s opposition, saying: “This botched deal is still a bad deal for the country and all yesterday did was mark the end of this government’s failed and miserable negotiations.”

The prime minister, who is about to embark on a nationwide tour to argue for her agreement, urged MPs to recognise the “absolute certainty that there is not a better deal available”.

“Our duty as a parliament over these coming weeks is to examine this deal in detail, to debate it respectfully, to listen to our constituents and decide what is in our national interest,” she said.

But she acknowledged the looming chaos, saying: “No-one knows what would happen if this deal doesn’t pass. It would open the door to more division and more uncertainty, with all the risks that will entail.”

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in