Boris Johnson could go to jail if he refuses to ask for extension to Brexit negotiations, according to senior judge
Supreme Court could issue rarely-used 'mandamus' order to require prime minister to go to Brussels
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Boris Johnson could be jailed for contempt of court if he refuses to request an extension to the UK’s Brexit negotiations, according to a senior judge who is an uncle of Downing Street adviser Dominic Cummings.
Former appeal court judge Sir John Laws predicted the Supreme Court will hear a case against the prime minister within days if he fails to meet the 19 October deadline to seek an extension from Brussels.
The court could issue a writ known as an “order of mandamus”, which is used to command a government entity properly to carry out a non-discretionary function.
The rarely-used device is regarded as a drastic remedy and failure to comply with it would be regarded as contempt of court.
The so-called Benn Act passed by a “rebel alliance” of opposition MPs and anti-no deal Tories earlier this month requires the PM to ask Brussels by 19 October to delay the date of Brexit to the end of January unless he has secured parliamentary approval for a deal or for a no-deal outcome.
Reports have suggested that Mr Cummings believes the courts would not be able to respond quickly enough if the deadline was missed to prevent the UK crashing out of the EU without a deal at the end of October.
But Sir John insisted the Supreme Court – which dramatically ruled on Tuesday that Mr Johnson’s suspension of parliamentary sittings was unlawful - could react swiftly to the legal challenge which would inevitably follow any failure by the PM to seek an extension.
He told the New Statesman magazine it was possible the court could convene within 24 hours, adding: “It can readily be within a week, I should have thought.”
Sir John said that the action taken by the court would depend on the discretion granted to Mr Johnson by the Act.
And he said: “If it is unambiguous, and plainly the unfulfilled duty of the prime minister, the court will … at least contemplate issuing an order of mandamus.”
If he still refused to go to Brussels to extend the Article 50 process, “ultimately he’d be guilty of contempt of court and sent to jail”, he said.
- Read the full article at https://www.newstatesman.com/politics/uk/2019/09/dominic-cummings-machiavel-downing-street
Subscribe to Independent Premium to bookmark this article
Want to bookmark your favourite articles and stories to read or reference later? Start your Independent Premium subscription today.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments