Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Boris Johnson’s controversial statements removed by Facebook

Comments made by Nadine Dorries and Angela Rayner were also removed by the platform

Emily Atkinson
Friday 11 March 2022 02:23 GMT
Comments
(AP)

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Controversial remarks made by Boris Johnson and other senior politicians were removed by Facebook after a privacy campaigning organisation posted them on the site using dummy accounts.

Big Brother Watch (BBW) devised the experiment to test Facebook’s content policies ahead of the publication of the revised Online Safety Bill, expected to be published next week.

The prime minister’s famed “letterboxes” comment, as well as quotes from culture secretary Nadine Dorries and Labour’s deputy leader Angela Rayner were among those removed by Facebook, the organisation said.

Mr Johnson’s 2018 remark that Muslim women wearing burkas look “like letter boxes” was removed by Facebook for breaching its policies on “harassment and bullying”, when posted by a dummy account.

One of the dummy posts using comments made by prime minister Boris Johnson
One of the dummy posts using comments made by prime minister Boris Johnson (Big Brother Watch)

It also posted comments made by Nadine Dorries, who is heading up the hotly anticipated Online Safety Bill, which were later removed by Facebook for breaching its “community standards on violence and incitement.”

“Be seen within a mile of my daughters and I will nail your balls to the floor,” was the remark chosen by BBW.

The campaign group said that, while Dorries’ language could be construed as a threat of violence in some contexts, the comment “was posted from a dummy account to Facebook without context and without being directed towards any particular individual.”

A separate account posted a comment made by culture secretary Nadine Dorries
A separate account posted a comment made by culture secretary Nadine Dorries (Big Brother Watch)

The Cabinet minister recently defended her comment, telling the DCMS Committee she “would expect any mother” to say the same in those circumstances. They responded by saying that it was “totally appropriate.”

A remark made by Angela Rayner in February this year - “shoot your terrorists and ask questions second” - was also scrapped by the platform for breaching the same violence and incitement policy.

When BBW disputed the decision from the dummy account, Facebook upheld its decision to remove the post.

Comments made by Angela Rayner posted via a dummy Facebook account
Comments made by Angela Rayner posted via a dummy Facebook account (Big Brother Watch)

Mark Johnson, legal and policy officer at BBW, said:“These comments by high profile politicians are unpleasant and have been rightly criticised, including by ourselves. However, unpleasantness alone is not a legitimate basis for censorship.

“This experiment clearly demonstrates that such controversial yet lawful speech is destined for unprecedented censorship under the Online Safety Bill.

“The government should be adopting a rule of law approach to online speech and reining in, not empowering, Big Tech speech police. But by compelling platforms to target lawful speech which is deemed to be ‘harmful’, the government will make social media censorship state-backed.

He added that social media companies are already doing “serious damage to free speech in the UK”, warning that the government’s new bill “would make this situation worse and threaten to cause a free speech crisis in this country.”

He added: “The Online Safety Bill would replace Britain’s carefully balanced right to free speech with the changing, censorious terms and conditions of foreign companies.

“The prime minister and the culture secretary should take stock of Facebook removing their own statements and drop powers to target so-called ‘legal but harmful’ speech from the Bill.”

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in