Boris Johnson’s claims on Europe played part in Thatcher downfall, documents suggest

Johnson claims on EU integration that spurred on Thatcher speech ‘not quite right’ archivist says

Vincent Wood
Saturday 29 February 2020 02:51 GMT
Comments
Thatcher makes her “no, no, no” speech in the House of Commons in 1990

Your support helps us to tell the story

As your White House correspondent, I ask the tough questions and seek the answers that matter.

Your support enables me to be in the room, pressing for transparency and accountability. Without your contributions, we wouldn't have the resources to challenge those in power.

Your donation makes it possible for us to keep doing this important work, keeping you informed every step of the way to the November election

Head shot of Andrew Feinberg

Andrew Feinberg

White House Correspondent

A contentious claim by Boris Johnson in a newspaper article regarding the European Union may have inadvertently led to the downfall of Margaret Thatcher, newly unearthed documents from her time in Downing Street suggest.

Documents released from the close of Thatcher’s years in power show she took note of a story on the European Commission’s then-president Jacques Delors in the Daily Telegraph – written by Mr Johnson during his time as Brussels correspondent

In the article published on 24 October 1990 under the headline “British Right Of Veto Faces Axe In Delors Plan”, Mr Johnson wrote: “M Delors said the plans were intended to pave the way for a Federation of Europe, a super-state with the Brussels Commission as the executive government and the Council of Ministers as a senate.”

Archivists have found that story made its way into the red box of the prime minister who was well known for diligently going through the briefing documents handed to her on a daily basis. She then proceeded to highlight the headline and the section outlining the push for ever-closer union Mr Delors appeared to be championing, marking two lines alongside each.

Just six days later Ms Thatcher would make her “no, no, no” speech in the House of Commons, a defiant show of Eurosceptisicism in which she claimed: “The president of the commission, Mr Delors, said at a press conference the other day that he wanted the European parliament to be the democratic body of the community, he wanted the commission to be the executive and he wanted the Council of Ministers to be the Senate. No. No. No.”

The speech is believed to have been one of the defining moments of Thatcher’s downfall, sparking the growing feud among the party over its place in Europe. In response Sir Geoffry Howe quit as leader of the Commons and deputy prime minister while delivering a devastating resignation speech which spelled doom for the PM.

However, Mr Johnson’s article was acknowledged to have not quite reflected the truth of the matter.

A memo written two days after its publication by senior Foreign Office official Richard Gozney to Thatcher’s private secretary Charles Powell – which was probably seen by Thatcher – noted: “The Commission Opinion itself... does not contain what M Delors is reported by the Daily Telegraph as having suggested.

“It does not propose any radical change in the present institutional plans of the Community – although it does contain a lot of other horrors.”

Chris Collins, from the Margaret Thatcher Archive Trust, which is making the documents available to the public, said Mr Johnson’s article was “not quite right” – and that Thatcher would have been aware of this.

However, he added that it made up part of a growing case against Europe being furthered by her party. He added: “A lot of Conservatives would read articles like that one by Boris Johnson – I’m sure it wasn’t the only one written at the time – and say ‘yes, that’s what these guys (in Brussels) are up to’.

“Those pressures are all around her and she is treading this terribly, perilously difficult path. It’s not clear that she wanted a war, as it were, and yet she feels many of these things too and she’s got this sinuous route to follow.

“While I’m not saying this is the cause of her downfall or anything like that – it would be absurd to suggest that – the forces that are in play are somewhat revealed by the presence of that article.”

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in