Boris Johnson given four days to explain why he wants his response to Jennifer Arcuri inquiry to remain secret
Prime minister’s response to Greater London Assembly probe dismissed as ‘insufficient’
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.The Greater London Assembly has given Boris Johnson until Monday to explain why his response to an inquiry into his links with Jennifer Arcuri should remain private.
The prime minister’s lawyers responded to the assembly’s request for information shortly after the deadline last week but made clear that his letter was “private and confidential” and “not for publication”.
However, the chair of the GLA’s Oversight Committee said the prime minister had “not provided the information requested” and asked why he wanted his response to be kept secret.
The committee is investigating allegations that Ms Arcuri, a technology entrepreneur, was given more than £100,000 of public money during Mr Johnson’s time as London mayor, as well as being invited on overseas trade missions that staff had deemed her unqualified for. Mr Johnson has refused to respond to claims about an affair between the pair, but has insisted that “everything was done with complete propriety”.
The GLA has the power to investigate anyone who has been Mayor of London within the last eight years.
It asked Mr Johnson to provide details of all his communications with Ms Arcuri during his eight years as Mayor between 2008 and 2016, along with an explanation of how his relationship with the former model was disclosed.
The prime minister now has four days to explain why his response to the request should not be made public.
In a letter to the prime minister’s lawyers, Labour GLA member Len Duvall, who chairs the assembly’s Oversight Committee, said: “Transparency and accountability are at the heart of the London Assembly’s operations and I was disappointed to see that your response is marked ‘Private and Confidential’ and ‘Not for Publication’.
“The reason for confidentiality is not given and, on the face of it, is unclear to me.
“I would request that you provide reasons for that confidentiality by 5pm on Monday 14 October 2019, so that the GLA Oversight Committee can consider appropriate handling of the letter.”
In addition to the GLA probe, Mr Johnson’s links with Ms Arcuri are also being investigated by the Independent Office for Police Conduct.
On Wednesday, Mr Duvall said he was “frustrated” that the response from the prime minister was “insufficient”, and warned that his committee could use its power to summons witnesses as part of its inquiry.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments