Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Boris Johnson defends making foreign NHS staff pay fees for service even though ‘they saved my life’

Prime minister says charge provides £900m for ‘national institution’

Rob Merrick
Deputy Political Editor
Wednesday 20 May 2020 13:31 BST
Comments
Boris Johnson defends making foreign NHS staff pay fees for service even though 'they saved my life'

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Boris Johnson has insisted foreign NHS staff must continue to pay huge fees for the service, despite admitting they saved his life.

Labour urged the prime minister to axe the controversial policy – which The Independent revealed would stay, despite a promised “review” – calling it “a gross insult”.

In reply, Mr Johnson acknowledged nurses from overseas had saved his life from coronavirus, but claimed the NHS would otherwise be left short of essential funding.

“We must look at the realities,” he warned, claiming it was “very difficult in the current circumstances to find alternative sources” of cash.

The immigration health surcharge – due to soar from £400 a year to £624 from this October – contributed £900m to the NHS every year, the prime minister said.

Sir Keir Starmer announced that Labour would table amendments to the immigration bill, saying: “For a care worker on the national living wage that will require working for 70 hours to pay off the fee.”

He added: “Every Thursday we go out and clap for our carers. Many of them are risking their lives for the sake of all of us.

“Does the prime minister think it’s right that care workers coming from abroad and working on our front line should have to pay a surcharge of hundreds – sometimes thousands of pounds – to use the NHS themselves?”

Because the surcharge is also paid by spouses and children, the total cost can reach a crippling £8,000 for a family of four on a five-year work permit.

And it will be extended to all EU citizens from next January if the Brexit process is completed by ending the transition period.

The Royal College of Nursing backed Labour’s move, calling the fees “a grossly unfair financial burden on our international workforce”.

“The government must drop this charge as a matter of urgency,” said Donna Kinnair, the college’s chief executive.

When put under pressure in the Commons, Mr Johnson said he had “thought a great deal” about exempting NHS workers from the surcharge – but had decided against it.

“I do accept and understand the difficulties faced by our amazing NHS staff and, like him, I’ve been a personal beneficiary of carers who have come from abroad and, frankly, saved my life,” he told Sir Keir.

But he added: “On the other hand we must look at the realities – this is a great national service, it’s a national institution, it needs funding and those contributions actually help us to raise about £900m, and it’s very difficult in the current circumstances to find alternative sources.”

The surcharge has been attacked as unfair, because migrants paying tax and national insurance are effectively paying twice to use the NHS.

It cannot be deferred, or paid annually, but is demanded in advance for the entire duration of an applicant’s visa or residency permit.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in