Boris Johnson refuses to apologise for blaming care homes for coronavirus death toll
Claim that care homes did not follow correct procedures branded 'insulting' to staff and operators
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Boris Johnson is not offering an apology or formal retraction for his claim that some care homes “didn’t really follow the procedures” to protect residents and staff from coronavirus, Downing Street has indicated.
The prime minister sparked outrage by appearing to blame care home operators for the huge toll of almost 20,000 fatalities from Covid-19 in their properties, with broadcaster Piers Morgan branding the comment "disgusting".
But his official spokesman dodged questions when asked eight times at a media briefing this morning whether the PM regretted his comments and would apologise or withdraw his comments.
Instead, the spokesman again and again repeated the same statement issued by Downing Street last night as fury erupted over his comments.
Asked to explain the high death figures in care homes during a visit to Yorkshire on Monday, Mr Johnson said: “We discovered too many care homes didn’t really follow the procedures in the way that they could have.”
Mark Adams, who runs the charity Community Integrated Care, told the BBC Radio 4's Today programme the prime minister's comments were "cowardly" and a "travesty of leadership".
Mr Adams added: "If this is genuinely his view, I think we're almost entering a Kafkaesque alternative reality where the government sets the rules, we follow them, they don't like the results, they then deny setting the rules and blame the people that were trying to do their best."
The National Care Forum said Mr Johnson's remarks were “totally inappropriate” and "hugely insulting" to care workers.
Forum executive director Vic Rayner said that care homes had followed the guidance "to the letter" but the government's attention was focused on hospitals.
“Government guidance has come to the sector in stops and starts – with organisations grappling with over 100 pieces of additional guidance in the same number of days, much of which was not accompanied by an understanding of the operational implications of operating care services,” she said.
Asked whether the PM would apologise or retract his statement, his spokesman said only: “Throughout the pandemic, care homes have done a brilliant job under very difficult circumstances.
“The PM was pointing out that nobody knew what the correct procedures were because the extent of asymptomatic transmission was not known at the time.
"We have put in place a comprehensive action plan to protect care homes, including rigorous testing and additional funding for PPE.”
In a series of eight questions, the spokesman was asked why Mr Johnson did not make these points yesterday, whether he was trying to imply that care home operators and staff had "done something wrong", whether the PM regretted his choice of words, whether he wanted to apologise or retract the comments and whether he was simply trying to "pass the buck" for government failings onto frontline staff.
In response to each question, he repeated the same statement.
More than half of care homes in England have been hit by Covid-19, according to official estimates, with one in five residents infected and 7 per cent of staff.
Anger has grown over the decision to discharge 25,000 hospital patients who had not been tested, fuelled by health secretary Matt Hancock’s notorious claim to have “thrown a protective ring” around them.
The fate of so many care home residents has also been blamed on the failure to provide enough personal protective equipment (PPE), with supplies requisitioned for the NHS.
It wasn’t until 15 April – almost a month after the lockdown began – that Mr Hancock finally promised to test all patients before they were admitted.
But, questioned in Goole, East Yorkshire, the prime minister pointed to poor practices, saying: “One of the things the crisis has shown is we need to think about how we organise our social care package better and how we make sure we look after people better who are in social care.
“We discovered too many care homes didn’t really follow the procedures in the way that they could have but we’re learning lessons the whole time.
“Most important is to fund them properly... but we will also be looking at ways to make sure the care sector long-term is properly organised and supported.”
The general secretary of public service union Unison, Dave Prentis, said it was "despicable for Boris Johnson to blame incredible, dedicated care workers for his own government’s failings".
Mr Prentis said: “Care staff have kept working throughout to help the vulnerable, putting their own health at risk with little or no protective kit and without testing. Many lacked full sick pay so couldn't afford to stop home. Others went unpaid if they became ill, causing real financial headaches for doing the right thing.
“This was all the result of poor decisions taken by his government. The prime minister should be ashamed, take responsibility and commit to proper, lasting reform of social care."
Mike Padgham, head of the Independent Care Group (ICG), said: “We should not be getting into the blame game and it is wrong to criticise care and nursing homes at this time.”
The vast majority of providers had “done their absolute best in the face of slow and conflicting advice”, he said, adding: “Providers were operating in the dark over what they ought to do and with one arm behind their backs in terms of the support they were given. In those circumstances, they have worked miracles.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments