Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Boris Johnson misleading public over impact of his 'unlawful' Brexit deal, trade experts warn

Tariffs would be charged on 75 per cent of Northern Irish imports, says study - which also finds that would break the law

Rob Merrick
Deputy Political Editor
Tuesday 10 December 2019 14:53 GMT
Comments
Goods crossing Irish sea after Brexit subject to checks if they are destined for the Republic, Boris Johnson admits

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Trade experts have uncovered fresh evidence that Boris Johnson is misleading voters about the impact of his Brexit deal on Northern Ireland – and are warning it is unlawful.

Tariffs would be charged on around 75 per cent of imports – including those from Great Britain – under the plan for a customs border in the Irish Sea, they have found.

“This is not easily reconciled with the government’s assertion that Northern Ireland remains within the UK customs territory,” said Professor Alan Winters, of the UK Trade Policy Observatory, at the University of Sussex.

At the weekend, the prime minister claimed there would be checks only on the minority of goods flowing from mainland UK to Northern Ireland and destined for the Irish Republic.

Furthermore, the new analysis warns that Mr Johnson’s agreement – under which the UK will leave the EU by the end of January, if he wins the general election 2019 – will break the law.

It contravenes the Taxation (Cross-border Trade) Act 2018 which prohibits “arrangements under which Northern Ireland forms part of a separate customs territory to Great Britain”.

The Northern Ireland “protocol” has become a growing controversy in the campaign, after the prime minister abandoned his previous promise never to agree to a customs barrier with Great Britain.

On Sunday, Mr Johnson claimed there would be no checks on goods flowing between Northern Ireland and Britain – despite his withdrawal agreement stating there will be – saying that wouldn’t “make sense”.

But the analysis by the trade observatory has found that about 82 per cent of Northern Ireland’s imports from non-EU countries would face new tariffs from Brussels.

They would also be charged on approximately 64 per cent of imports from Great Britain – and therefore on around three-quarters of all Northern Irish imports.

The study also echoes fears already raised by the Democratic Unionist Party that British companies will increasingly shun Northern Ireland over time, because of the new barriers.

It warns that mainland exporters are likely to “lose market share” in Northern Ireland because of the imposition of tariffs.

In addition, it suggests it will be “difficult” to introduce the promised system of rebates for buyers of UK goods in Northern Ireland, if they are not destined for the Republic.

Professor Winters added: “A free trade agreement between the UK and the EU would not completely avoid the problem.

“While goods produced in Great Britain exported to Northern Ireland and transiting on to the Republic of Ireland would face no tariffs, they would still need to satisfy rules of origin to prove that they had been produced in Great Britain.

“Hence there would still be administrative hurdles for such exports to jump.”

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in