Blunkett unveils tougher anti-terror plans
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Wide-ranging emergency anti-terrorism laws were announced today by the Home Secretary after the attacks on America last month.
David Blunkett told MPs that a new Anti-Terrorism Bill would include tougher powers to remove suspected terrorists from the UK.
Security would be strengthened at airports and on board aircraft, and British Transport Police would be given wider powers to tackle terrorism.
The law on incitement would be extended to cover religious, as well as racial, hatred, he confirmed.
In a statement, Mr Blunkett stressed: "There is no immediate intelligence pointing to a specific threat to the UK, but we remain alert, domestically as well as internationally."
Pledging to strike a balance between civil liberties and the need to combat the terrorist threat, he added: "The legislative measures I have outlined will protect and enhance our rights, not diminish them.
"If we fail now to take the necessary action to protect our people, future generations will never forgive us."
The measures were given a broad welcome by shadow home secretary Oliver Letwin, although he warned against "over hasty" legislation, undertaken with insufficient scrutiny.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments