Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Blunkett comes to defence of proposals to lock up the mentally ill indefinitely

Andrew Grice,Marie Woolf
Wednesday 30 October 2002 01:00 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

David Blunkett is to defend plans for psychopaths to be locked up indefinitely amid signs the proposals will fail to pass through Parliament.

Labour MPs will join a coalition of Tories, Liberal Democrats and independent peers in an attempt to block the Mental Health Bill to be announced in the Queen's Speech next month. The Department of Health has reservations about the proposed powers to force people with untreatable illnesses into mental hospitals, but Mr Blunkett is determined to press ahead.

Speaking to the mental health charity the Zito Trust today, the Home Secretary will say his Bill will stop the victims of people suffering mental illness being treated as "second class citizens". Mr Blunkett will insist his measure will strike the right balance. He will say: "The right of safety for victims and the community with the rights of individuals with mental health problems are complementary aims, not opposing aims."

Privately, ministers are bracing themselves for a rough ride in Parliament and are believe that if the proposals are not amended, they will not be passed by the House of Lords.

Senior Labour MPs including David Hinchliffe, the chairman of the Commons Health Select Committee, have expressed grave reservations. They are worried by plans to allow the compulsory detention of psychopaths or people with "dangerous and severe personality disorders" that are not considered to be treatable.

The Home Office, which will jointly sponsor the bill with the Department of Health, wants to push through measures to clamp down on dangerous people such as Michael Stone, who murdered Lin Russell and her daughter Megan in 1996, and Christopher Clunis, a schizophrenic who stabbed Jonathan Zito to death on a tube platform in an unprovoked attack.

Fifty organisations including the main mental health charities, the Royal College of Pychiatrists and the British Association of Social Workers have expressed concerns about allowing doctors to force people with mental illnesses to take medication. The Bill will also allow the compulsory detention in a mental hospital of "any disorder or disability of mind or brain which results in mental impairment or disturbance of mental functioning".

Charities say the plans are draconian and vague and could be used against consistently obstreperous, violent and dysfunctional teenagers.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in