Blunkett battles Labour rebels over asylum
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.David Blunkett came under concerted fire from Labour MPs yesterday over his planned overhaul of the asylum system, including a proposal to put the children of rejected refugees into care.
The Home Secretary was accused of making youngsters suffer for the actions of their parents and urged to improve the quality of initial decisions on asylum applications.
But in a combative Commons performance he turned on his critics, saying they were avoiding a "sensible" debate and warning the Government faced "the devil's own job" in ejecting fraudulent claimants.
The clashes came during the Second Reading of the Asylum and Immigration Bill, which strips benefits from failed claimants who refuse to accept a free flight home, with the result that their children could be handed into care. A series of Labour MPs backed a rebel amendment complaining the legislation "would make children destitute".
Leading the revolt against the "immoral" Bill, Hilton Dawson, the MP for Lancaster and Wyre, told ministers: "You are wrong, you are taking us a step far too far.
"It seems extraordinary to have to say this to a Labour Government but you should never, ever, under any circumstances whatsoever, whatever the parents have done, whoever they are, wherever they've come from ... remove the basic means of substance from children."
But Mr Blunkett said the immigration service would face no chance of dealing with failed claimants if parents knew they could still receive support because of their children. "Do we simply say if you're a family and you touch British soil you are here forever? We can't do that and have a credible system."
He also highlighted the growing problem of asylum-seekers destroying travel documents en route to Britain.
"Without a country to receive them [because of lack of documentation], we've nowhere to remove them to," he said.
"We can't eject them into outer space."
Subscribe to Independent Premium to bookmark this article
Want to bookmark your favourite articles and stories to read or reference later? Start your Independent Premium subscription today.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments