Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Blair shuns George Cross furore

Ian Herbert,Ben Russell
Friday 17 February 2006 01:00 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Downing Street has said Tony Blair will not try to overturn the decision to deny a posthumous George Cross to a police officer killed by a terror suspect.

The George Cross Committee's decision to grant neither the cross nor the George Medal to Detective Constable Stephen Oake was greeted with indignation in Manchester, where he is credited with saving the lives of three colleagues three years ago by clinging to an Algerian terrorist, Kamel Bourgass, now serving life for his murder.

He was nominated by the Greater Manchester Police Chief Constable Michael Todd. He could have been the first winner of the civilian equivalent of the Victoria Cross, awarded for "acts of the greatest heroism or the most conspicuous courage in circumstances of extreme danger".

But the committee, chaired by Cabinet Secretary Sir Gus O'Donnell, ruled that the officer's actions, spontaneous rather than calculated, did not meet the "extremely high" standards required.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in