Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Blair misled House on NHS

Jonathon Carr-Brown
Sunday 26 March 2000 02:00 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Tony Blair misled the House of Commons last week by overstating the Government's extra spending on the NHS by nearly £14bn.

The Prime Minister told MPs on Wednesday that extra commitments outlined by the Chancellor in the Budget would mean that money for the health service would rise to £82.5bn. But that figure included estimated spending on private health care.

The error is particularly embarrassing for the Government since it has come under pressure to improve the health service after the winter flu crisis resulted in cancelled operations and a shortage of beds. Private medicine is still anathema to many traditional Labour supporters.

The Prime Minister told the Commons that "by 2003-04, NHS spending will have risen to 7.6 per cent of gross domestic product [GDP]." But the real figure is 6.3 per cent or £68.7bn according to the Treasury's statistical bible, the Red Book. Mr Blair's figure includes spending on private health care, bringing the total to £82.5bn.

Dr Liam Fox, the shadow secretary of state for health, accused the Prime Minister of "lying". "For this Government there appears to be no such thing as truth," he said. "They will distort any figure to make the argument they want."

A Downing Street spokesman admitted the statement could have been worded better but claimed "no one could have been in any doubt about what he meant."

But a health service finance expert said that, because it was not obvious that the prime minister was referring to NHS and private spending, it would have confused people. "It was the NHS that was struggling over the winter, not the private sector," said Tom Jones, the health spokesman at the Association of Chartered Certificated Accountants.

Mr Blair has promised to match European levels on spending, which are currently 8.9 per cent of GDP. But "what the Government should be worrying about is that they are still nowhere near the EU average, even when private spending is added", Mr Jones said.

The discrepancy was spotted by Keith Marsden, a World Bank economist. "The Government isn't really being straightforward," he said. "Blair's pledge was for NHS spending to match EU levels, not NHS spending and private spending. The figures he is quoting is for total health care spending in the UK, not NHS spending."

Dr Fox said: "This was a written statement given to the House of Commons. It means you can tell lies in the House of Commons as long as you're the Prime Minister." Under the code of conduct for ministers, those who mislead the Commons, intentionally or otherwise, must return to correct the mistake.

A Downing Street spokesman said: "It is well known for the purposes of international comparison you always include private health care.

"The Prime Minister's statement is referring to the rise in NHS spending which is bringing UK spending up to 7.6 per cent of GDP. If it was 7.6 per cent on NHS spending alone then the total health spend would have been 8.6 per cent, way above EU average, which we would have called attention to."

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in