‘Overpriced junk food’: Ben and Jerry’s and Priti Patel in strange war of words over treatment of migrants
Tory party chairman also joins row – accusing ice cream company of ‘statistically inaccurate virtue signalling’
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.The Home Office has attacked ice cream giant Ben and Jerry’s after the company criticised home secretary Priti Patel’s approach to English Channel migrant crossings in a series of tweets.
The UK branch of the ice cream and frozen yoghurt firm suggested Ms Patel and her team show more “humanity”, adding: “People wouldn’t make dangerous journeys if they had any other choice.”
A Home Office official dismissed the concerns from the makers of “overpriced junk food” – and Tory party chairman James Cleverly accused Ben and Jerry’s of “statistically inaccurate virtue signalling” over the issue.
“Priti is working day and night to bring an end to these small boat crossings, which are facilitated by international criminal gangs and are rightly of serious concern to the British people,” said a Home Office source.
“If that means upsetting the social media team for a brand of overpriced junk food, then so be it.”
Foreign office minister Mr Cleverly tweeted: “Can I have a large scoop of statistically inaccurate virtue signalling with my grossly overpriced ice cream, please?”
The strange spat began when the company’s UK Twitter account posted several tweets tagging the home secretary, beginning: “Hey @PritiPatel, we think the real crisis is our lack of humanity for people fleeing war, climate change and torture.”
Condemning the government’s rhetoric, the firm added: “People cannot be illegal. And, it is enshrined in the 1951 Refugee Convention that crossing a border ‘illegally’ should not impact your asylum claim.”
Mr Cleverly appeared to take issue with the ice cream company’s claim that “the UK hasn’t resettled any refugees since March”.
Although the UK’s refugee resettlement scheme has been frozen since March, asylum seekers have been able to make a claim for family union as they arrive into the UK.
Ben and Jerry’s was founded in 1978 by best friends Ben Cohen and Jerry Greenfield before being sold to the multinational Unilever in 2000.
Mr Greenfield has described himself as an “ageing hippy” – telling The Independent in 2015 that he and his friend “still try to make a difference” despite having no formal role at the ice cream company.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments