Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

BBC accuses No 10 of manipulation as Whitehall names source of dossier claim

The BBC, the Tory leader and American Democrats heap pressure on Allied leaders over their case for going to war

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

The identity of a Whitehall official who admitted attending an "unauthorised" meeting with the BBC journalist Andrew Gilligan was revealed yesterday, deepening the corporation's dispute with the Government over an Iraqi weapons dossier.

David Kelly, a government adviser and former senior UN weapons inspector, was named by the Ministry of Defence as the official who had attended a meeting with Mr Gilligan to discuss the September dossier, which the journalist claimed later had been "sexed up".

Mr Kelly is an international expert on biological warfare with decades of experience in his field. He worked as deputy chief scientific officer at Porton Down before becoming a senior weapons inspector with Unscom. As well as leading inspections to Russia, he also made 37 visits to Iraq over seven years in the 1990s.

Mr Kelly is currently serving as a senior advisor to the Ministry of Defence and the Foreign Office as an expert in biological warfare. He was one of a number of specialists who gave evidence to the Commons Foreign Affairs Select Committee in September last year.

He was named after Geoff Hoon, the Defence Secretary, wrote to the BBC demanding to know if he was the source of Mr Gilligan's claims that the dossier had been "sexed up".

Downing Street promptly faced accusations that it had tried to manipulate the timing of the revelation in an attempt to divert attention away from the backbench revolt in the vote on foundation hospitals.

The Government was also criticised for changing its account of the role of Mr Kelly and his relationship with Mr Gilligan. On Tuesday, it stated he was an employee of the Ministry of Defence (MoD) and had known the defence correspondent of BBC Radio 4's Today programme for a few months. But yesterday, Tony Blair's spokesman said the contact had been "acquainted" with Mr Gilligan for years.

The changes in the account came after the BBC stated that Mr Gilligan's source for the original story was known to him for years and that he was not employed by the MoD.

On Tuesday afternoon, Richard Sambrook, the BBC's head of news, was asked to meet Mr Hoon to discuss something "important" in relation to the row between the BBC and the Government. But Mr Sambrook was told nothing in particular during the half-hour meeting at Westminster and he returned to his office mystified. According to Whitehall sources, Mr Hoon had intended to tell Mr Sambrook the source had been identified. But the plan was changed after No 10 intervened, intending to delay the announcement for the evening news bulletins.

Downing Street denied that information about Mr Kelly had been deliberately held back. The Prime Minister's official spokesman insisted that the MoD wanted to make "rigorous checks" before going public.

Downing Street said: "This is not a trap. It is not an assault on journalistic standards, but a genuine attempt to get at the truth about serious allegations." It denied playing a game of "knocking down sources" until Mr Gilligan's informant had been found, adding: "How many people did Andrew Gilligan meet on 22 May in a London hotel?"

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in