Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Autumn Statement: Universal Credit freeze hurts working poor, poverty experts claim

Charities speak out against budget that does nothing for the poor

Emily Dugan
Wednesday 03 December 2014 19:08 GMT
Comments
There was scant good news in the statement for those at the bottom, according to Anti-poverty campaigners
There was scant good news in the statement for those at the bottom, according to Anti-poverty campaigners (Getty)

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

It was supposed to be the flagship welfare reform that made work pay but the Government was accused of torpedoing its own policy after the rates of Universal Credit were frozen for those in work.

By pushing through a real terms cut for the support given to those in low-paid jobs, experts say the Government will make it harder to survive in minimum wage employment.

Gareth Jenkins, Save the Children’s UK policy director, said: “More than three million hard-working families – those the Chancellor purports to represent – are reliant on benefits to top up their wages to make their hours pay. A freeze means a devaluation and in reality will mean a disincentive to work.

“British parents struggling in minimum wage jobs will see their income cut by this measure and we’re concerned this indicates the shape of things to come. The books should not be balanced on the backs of the poorest families.”

Anti-poverty campaigners said the freezing of the benefit came amid a backdrop of scant good news in the statement for those at the bottom.

Alison Garnham, chief executive of Child Poverty Action Group, said: "It’s striking that the only giveaway for children was for families who can afford to fly them abroad on holiday. For millions more children, today’s Autumn Statement is about staying the course for poverty rather than prosperity."

She added: “By cutting Universal Credit once again, the Chancellor is in very real danger of torpedoing Iain Duncan Smith’s flagship policy. Freezing the work allowance will harm work incentives and hit low paid families hard. Two thirds of poor children live in working families; we should be redistributing help towards them, not away from them.”

Delays in the rollout of Universal Credit, the timetable of which has been pushed back and back since its launch, have contributed to Government savings, it emerged meanwhile. The Office for Budget Responsibility said that some of Iain Duncan Smith's welfare reforms were saving less money than expected but that this had partly been offset by delays in Universal Credit.

An announcement that EU migrants would be blocked from receiving job seekers allowance if, after six weeks, they have no reasonable prospect of finding work, was clearly an overture to Ukip sympathisers and immigration skeptics. However, the measure saved just £15 million, a sum so paltry in Government budget terms that it prompted analysts to question the Government's rhetoric on the issue.

Alex Glennie, senior research fellow at the Institute for Public Policy Research, said: “The measures announced in today’s Autumn Statement are the first time that the Government has acknowledged that the scale of so-called ‘benefit tourism’ to the UK is likely to be minimal at best. While it is legitimate to assess the rules around access to employment benefits for European migrants, a predicted saving of just £15 million shows just how few people this will affect. This should be set against the significant economic benefit that EU migrants are known to bring to the UK.”

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in