Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

'Up to 40,000' people wrongly identified as eligible for 'bedroom tax' – and may have already been forced to move

 

Ian Johnston
Friday 10 January 2014 00:38 GMT
Comments
Up to 40,000 people could have been wrongly identified as eligible for the so-called 'bedroom tax'
Up to 40,000 people could have been wrongly identified as eligible for the so-called 'bedroom tax' (Peter Macdiarmid/Getty Images)

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Up to 40,000 people could have been wrongly identified as eligible for the so-called “bedroom tax”, according to a report.

Some of those affected by an error by the Department of Work and Pensions (DWP) may have already moved to a smaller home or be facing eviction, The Guardian reported.

A loophole in the legislation for the “spare room subsidy” - as it is officially called - means docking benefit payments for some social housing tenants was not legal.

The DWP, which plans to close the loophole, estimated 5,000 people were affected, but housing experts said it could be up to 40,000.

They could now be entitled for refunds of hundreds of pounds. People given emergency housing funding to cope with the shortfall may get refunds and therefore actually profit from the mistake.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in