Human teaching must be at ‘heart of schools’ over ‘dangerous’ AI – headteacher
Sir Anthony Seldon, headteacher of Epsom College, warned of the risks of plagiarism and deepfakes.
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Human teaching must be at the “heart of schools” amid concerns over “invidious and dangerous” artificial intelligence (AI), a headteacher has said.
Sir Anthony Seldon, headteacher of Epsom College, warned of the risks of plagiarism and deepfakes, which could cause “moral damage” to young people.
It comes after a letter sent to The Times earlier this week, signed by more than 60 education figures, said schools are “bewildered” by the rate of change of AI and believe it is moving “far too quickly”.
Prime Minister Rishi Sunak had previously said “guardrails” are to be put in place to maximise the benefits of AI while minimising the risks to society.
We have to take it into our own hands, schools, to ensure that human intelligence is at the very heart at schools, artificial intelligence will never take over from humans as long as we put human intelligence first
Sir Anthony told Sky News’s Sophy Ridge On Sunday: “It is extremely invidious and dangerous how manipulating the technology can be because it will understand when we’re shopping, when we’re looking on the internet, the personalisation of the material that comes to us will become far more sophisticated.
“Young people are young, they can’t negotiate the world very well, and so the opportunity for them to be manipulated, bullied, brought into practices, drugs, all the rest of it, is very worrying to parents, very worrying to schools.
“So, what we’re saying is, look, the tech companies have a lot of profit motive, they’re making enormous amounts of money out of the technology, that we can’t make them go away.
“We have to ensure that we provide parents, schools, teachers, with really good information about what is wholesome, stimulating, good AI and what people should be aware of because government really have caught up in the last few months, but they’re still behind the curve and they never quite understand what happens in schools.
“Parliament is doing some good work but they take a lot of time to come out with their statutes and recommendations, we have to take it into our own hands, schools, to ensure that human intelligence is at the very heart at schools, artificial intelligence will never take over from humans as long as we put human intelligence first.”
Mr Sunak has previously advocated the technology’s benefits for national security and the economy, but there are concerns with the ChatGPT bot – which has passed exams and can compose prose.
Sir Anthony said certain technologies can do some “heavy lifting” for teachers, including marking and assessments, to allow them to spend more time with pupils, despite warning of the “very real risks”.
The letter from headteachers read: “Schools are bewildered by the very fast rate of change in AI, and seek secure guidance and counsel on the best way forward. But whose advice can we trust?
“We have no confidence that the large digital companies will be capable of regulating themselves in the interests of students, staff and schools.
“Neither in the past has government shown itself capable or willing to do so.”
The heads said they are pleased the Government is now “grasping the nettle” but added: “The truth is that AI is moving far too quickly for government or Parliament alone to provide the real-time advice that schools need.
“We are announcing today our own cross-sector body composed of leading teachers in our schools, guided by a panel of independent digital and AI experts, to advise schools on which AI developments are likely to be beneficial, and which are damaging.”